Touronaut
@touronaut.bsky.social
Reposted by Touronaut
Let me break this down for non-lawyers:
1. By tomorrow at 10 EST, someone with Cabinet-level authority has to update the Court on whether they're invoking state secret privilege.
2. By 3/25, the judge wants a sworn statement from a government official on whether the privilege will be invoked
1. By tomorrow at 10 EST, someone with Cabinet-level authority has to update the Court on whether they're invoking state secret privilege.
2. By 3/25, the judge wants a sworn statement from a government official on whether the privilege will be invoked
NEW: Boasberg's patience is wearing thin.
"In an ex parte pleading delivered shortly after today’s deadline, the Government again evaded its obligations."
He orders government to show cause as to why it didn't violate court order by failing to return migrants on 2 planes that departed March 15..
"In an ex parte pleading delivered shortly after today’s deadline, the Government again evaded its obligations."
He orders government to show cause as to why it didn't violate court order by failing to return migrants on 2 planes that departed March 15..
March 20, 2025 at 8:59 PM
Let me break this down for non-lawyers:
1. By tomorrow at 10 EST, someone with Cabinet-level authority has to update the Court on whether they're invoking state secret privilege.
2. By 3/25, the judge wants a sworn statement from a government official on whether the privilege will be invoked
1. By tomorrow at 10 EST, someone with Cabinet-level authority has to update the Court on whether they're invoking state secret privilege.
2. By 3/25, the judge wants a sworn statement from a government official on whether the privilege will be invoked