Titus Brown
titus.idyll.org
Titus Brown
@titus.idyll.org
I am not a deep man, but I have many shallows. [email protected], http://ivory.idyll.org/blog/.
nah, 'cause it'll be me, too!
November 19, 2025 at 11:17 PM
well, if your preferred tipple of choice is snakemake, maybe you can use whatever it is I build 😭
November 19, 2025 at 8:27 PM
yep yep. curious if you know of a package or workflow to do this, from e.g. blastx or diamond? I can dream something up easily enough but I'm already about 12 workflows in on this paper and getting a bit tired of double-cross-checking all the code 😅.
November 19, 2025 at 7:59 PM
yes, exactly - we are basically at that point of saying, well, it doesn't classify so... can we assume it's not euk? :)
November 19, 2025 at 2:26 PM
yeah, that's pretty much where we are - gene calls and sequence gazing. Hard to do on a large scale though, or at least it feels annoying to me.
November 19, 2025 at 1:11 PM
with BLAST, translated.
November 19, 2025 at 1:11 PM
problem is that you can only do this on marker genes. So we know the MAG itself is "good", by usual standards. But want to rule out (as best possible) contigs that are unknown contam.
November 19, 2025 at 1:10 PM
virus would actually be fine ;). Just want to avoid euk.
November 19, 2025 at 1:09 PM
(if you need names, jill banfield and meren would be the people I'd trust more than most anyone else ;))
November 18, 2025 at 8:40 PM
I will put you on the "preprint available" list and wait for your shots on target :)
November 18, 2025 at 7:10 PM
Also, I know too much about assembly to trust contigs past a certain point :)
November 18, 2025 at 6:41 PM
we have "good" MAGs. We have reads matching to the MAGs from metagenomes. So we could do contig and read analysis both, but I feel like the reads are the primary data. Assembly is possible but not in all cases. Trying to rule out (as best possible) euk matches, esp from host.

thx!
November 18, 2025 at 6:39 PM