This one isn't even an aspect ratio change, they just re-scanned the original elements and somehow forgot to re-do the effects erasing the stagehand in what must have been a major rush job.

Looks like they also completely borked the color grading.

Wait, the company formerly known as Clear Channel Communications are being the good guys in broadcasting? Now I've seen everything.

Something about this movie is generating some of the most unhinged removed-from-reality takes.

Okay, and what happens when it gets fed a list of symptoms that's also an emergency but it says "relax bro, that's nothing" and they believe that? You didn't address the fact that these machines are inherently error ridden and don't know what they're talking about.

I don't know what that's supposed to mean or how it's supposed to be an answer for what I said. It's a complete non-sequitor, one you've now pasted in response to at least three people in a way that seems very normal and human.

When those things fail the failure is very obvious and people adjust accordingly. LLMs give out incorrect advice with extreme confidence and people don't know what they don't know.

If this is supposed to be a useful tool then it's failure rate is obviously relevant.

No audience "grew up" with ChatGPT. It's existed in the mainstream for, what, three years?

It gave correct advice *that time.* It won't do that every time. Even it gives the right advice 9/10 times that means 10% of animals will be mistreated because people were relying on the advice of a device that has no idea what it's talking about.

Isn't that owned by Warner Brothers via New Line?

Also strange that she seems to think legacy network CBS is in any position to "sideline voices like Hasan Piker, Tucker Carlson and Nick Fuentes," three people CBS news wasn't platforming in the first place.

Also I'm pretty sure "Hasan piker, Nick Fuentes, and Tucker Carlson" weren't exactly CBS fixtures before she showed up anyway...