David J. Doorey (aka The Law of Work)
@thelawofwork.bsky.social
Professor of Work Law & Labour Relations. #Toronto #PEC
LawofWork.ca
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=553786
LawofWork.ca
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=553786
Reposted by David J. Doorey (aka The Law of Work)
PS It was great as always to see you offline @eidlin.bsky.social (truly, you are always offering solid, empowering perspectives on labour and are the best dressed in the room! an icon!!) and it was amazing to meet you, @thelawofwork.bsky.social (and while I'm striking, at that!).
November 11, 2025 at 5:48 PM
PS It was great as always to see you offline @eidlin.bsky.social (truly, you are always offering solid, empowering perspectives on labour and are the best dressed in the room! an icon!!) and it was amazing to meet you, @thelawofwork.bsky.social (and while I'm striking, at that!).
I think the goal of the argument is to avoid Section 1 entirely. That is, there is not even a Section 2(d) breach as long as neutral arbitration is substituted.
November 11, 2025 at 3:59 PM
I think the goal of the argument is to avoid Section 1 entirely. That is, there is not even a Section 2(d) breach as long as neutral arbitration is substituted.
Seems to me that is a very surprising read of SFL.
If that argument were accepted by courts then SFL would have the bizarre effect of abolishing the right to strike, since govts could just legislate arbitration whenever it suits them (ie whenever a strike would be effective).
If that argument were accepted by courts then SFL would have the bizarre effect of abolishing the right to strike, since govts could just legislate arbitration whenever it suits them (ie whenever a strike would be effective).
November 11, 2025 at 3:53 PM
Seems to me that is a very surprising read of SFL.
If that argument were accepted by courts then SFL would have the bizarre effect of abolishing the right to strike, since govts could just legislate arbitration whenever it suits them (ie whenever a strike would be effective).
If that argument were accepted by courts then SFL would have the bizarre effect of abolishing the right to strike, since govts could just legislate arbitration whenever it suits them (ie whenever a strike would be effective).
Great name! Will check them out.
November 7, 2025 at 5:46 PM
Great name! Will check them out.
Well I’ve heard of many of the performers. But I have heard any of the songs or albums nominated.
November 7, 2025 at 5:08 PM
Well I’ve heard of many of the performers. But I have heard any of the songs or albums nominated.
A worker who does real work (work that needs to be done) for a not-for-profit MAY also be an "employee", but that requires a more nuanced analysis. We want people to volunteer for charities.
But it's more straightforward for for-profit businesses.
Real Work + For-Profit Business = NOT Volunteer.
But it's more straightforward for for-profit businesses.
Real Work + For-Profit Business = NOT Volunteer.
November 7, 2025 at 3:14 PM
A worker who does real work (work that needs to be done) for a not-for-profit MAY also be an "employee", but that requires a more nuanced analysis. We want people to volunteer for charities.
But it's more straightforward for for-profit businesses.
Real Work + For-Profit Business = NOT Volunteer.
But it's more straightforward for for-profit businesses.
Real Work + For-Profit Business = NOT Volunteer.