Nick Holmes
@thehandlab.bsky.social
handy neuroscientist | touch & movement | brain stimulation | neurobiography.info | pod @theerrorbar.bsky.social theerrorbar.com | @tmsmultilab.bsky.social https://tms-rat.org https://tms-smart.info | b. 335ppm C💚2 | pro birds | Associating with Professors
Reposted by Nick Holmes
That’s certainly a fexcectorn factor for this runctitional post.
November 29, 2025 at 6:31 AM
That’s certainly a fexcectorn factor for this runctitional post.
If only journalists realised how tricky
November 25, 2025 at 11:19 PM
If only journalists realised how tricky
It's .30 in the image, not .03..!
November 23, 2025 at 7:17 PM
It's .30 in the image, not .03..!
I'm in Nottingham now, I come back every few weeks to see colleagues & friends. The last time I came the atmosphere was very very different - shocking how each person I met was in despair of some kind 😔
November 18, 2025 at 10:06 PM
I'm in Nottingham now, I come back every few weeks to see colleagues & friends. The last time I came the atmosphere was very very different - shocking how each person I met was in despair of some kind 😔
Ugh. Nottingham Uni staff & student body is great, but their management have repeatedly screwed the pooch over the last decade. So f'ing predictable 🙄.
November 18, 2025 at 9:57 PM
Ugh. Nottingham Uni staff & student body is great, but their management have repeatedly screwed the pooch over the last decade. So f'ing predictable 🙄.
I also remember Andrew Glennerster & David Field (Uni of Reading) talking about this sort of thing - what if vision was all just distances and relationships and images - there's no 3D representation at all. They were convincing!
November 18, 2025 at 5:40 AM
I also remember Andrew Glennerster & David Field (Uni of Reading) talking about this sort of thing - what if vision was all just distances and relationships and images - there's no 3D representation at all. They were convincing!
(If you tilt the screen & look at a very shallow angle it is v easy to see)
There's a journal 'Medical Hypotheses' which I used to look at - for doctors with ideas but no time (also for quacks!); Perception journal would consider your two sentence paper I guess?
Is it like Marr's 2.5D sketch?
There's a journal 'Medical Hypotheses' which I used to look at - for doctors with ideas but no time (also for quacks!); Perception journal would consider your two sentence paper I guess?
Is it like Marr's 2.5D sketch?
November 18, 2025 at 5:37 AM
(If you tilt the screen & look at a very shallow angle it is v easy to see)
There's a journal 'Medical Hypotheses' which I used to look at - for doctors with ideas but no time (also for quacks!); Perception journal would consider your two sentence paper I guess?
Is it like Marr's 2.5D sketch?
There's a journal 'Medical Hypotheses' which I used to look at - for doctors with ideas but no time (also for quacks!); Perception journal would consider your two sentence paper I guess?
Is it like Marr's 2.5D sketch?
Yes, that's it - if we account for all the available data, theory will be found wanting, ad infinitum.
November 17, 2025 at 8:46 PM
Yes, that's it - if we account for all the available data, theory will be found wanting, ad infinitum.