Owl? Red kite? Buzzard? 🤔
At this position from the camera, this is a big bird!
#Ornithology #Birding #Twitcher
Owl? Red kite? Buzzard? 🤔
At this position from the camera, this is a big bird!
#Ornithology #Birding #Twitcher
(error when viewing a work document in a work email from a work colleague on a work computer)
(error when viewing a work document in a work email from a work colleague on a work computer)
Together at last! #FoxOfTheDay
(No mammals suffered in the making of this image. Hedgehogs are 💪.)
Together at last! #FoxOfTheDay
(No mammals suffered in the making of this image. Hedgehogs are 💪.)
(Feyerabend 1975/1993, p163)
#MetaScience #ScientificReform #ReplicationCrisis #PhilSci
(Feyerabend 1975/1993, p163)
#MetaScience #ScientificReform #ReplicationCrisis #PhilSci
Q1: What's wrong with this graph 🤔
For context, these are 10 patients with spinal cord injury tested before & after transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (TSCS)
#stats
Q1: What's wrong with this graph 🤔
For context, these are 10 patients with spinal cord injury tested before & after transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (TSCS)
#stats
I'll bring you more as the story unfolds. I fully expect a pile-on at Ptolemy's social media accounts in the next 24-48 hours. Hold tight.
#OpenScience #MetaScience #HPS #QRP #P-hacking #ScienceFraud
I'll bring you more as the story unfolds. I fully expect a pile-on at Ptolemy's social media accounts in the next 24-48 hours. Hold tight.
#OpenScience #MetaScience #HPS #QRP #P-hacking #ScienceFraud
I found a letter from 2012. I'd worked at the University of Reading for 3 years, had worked like a dog, supervised PhD students, published papers, did everything I could...
I found a letter from 2012. I'd worked at the University of Reading for 3 years, had worked like a dog, supervised PhD students, published papers, did everything I could...
are there any handy guides out there about principled ways to constrain those parameters? I guess I should just look at each one in turn and check the range is biologically plausible? Or..?
🙏
are there any handy guides out there about principled ways to constrain those parameters? I guess I should just look at each one in turn and check the range is biologically plausible? Or..?
🙏
The answer suggests that we can't use MEPs as a proxy measure of the stimulus- & response-interference processes that lead up to a manual response.
We need to TMS another brain area..!
The answer suggests that we can't use MEPs as a proxy measure of the stimulus- & response-interference processes that lead up to a manual response.
We need to TMS another brain area..!
- only in the responding hand (there is no 'spill-over' into the non-responding hand)
- not in the non-responding hand (there is no 'inhibition' of the non-responding hand)
- no dependence on interference type
4/n
- only in the responding hand (there is no 'spill-over' into the non-responding hand)
- not in the non-responding hand (there is no 'inhibition' of the non-responding hand)
- no dependence on interference type
4/n
- 2-coil #TMS over left & right primary motor cortex
- TMS in the ~300ms before one hand responds
- corticospinal excitability increases before response
- no changes in non-responding hand
1/n
- 2-coil #TMS over left & right primary motor cortex
- TMS in the ~300ms before one hand responds
- corticospinal excitability increases before response
- no changes in non-responding hand
1/n
Smartphone + binoculars 😄
Smartphone + binoculars 😄
I once converted (re-anakysed from reported effects) a whole phd thesis' Bayesian stats into t-tests (fun day...). It was very useful for detecting errors, but otherwise, same-same...
I once converted (re-anakysed from reported effects) a whole phd thesis' Bayesian stats into t-tests (fun day...). It was very useful for detecting errors, but otherwise, same-same...