I'm not aware of any that do a great job *explaining* why subjective experience attends particular physical states, but there are several which at least purport to *describe* which physical states are attended by subjective experience, and that's implicitly what I depend on to say you're conscious.

In particular, these experiments are providing evidence about the actual internal mechanisms and not just the input/output mapping.

I think empirical experiment can provide evidence of consciousness even if not proof, since the most plausible philosophical theories of consciousness say that it coincides with the presence of certain mechanisms. If this were not so, then I could not even acquire evidence that you are conscious.

What's the Atlantic piece you're referring to?

Sources: x.com/orthonormali..., x.com/nonagonono/s...

(I wrote this reply on Twitter but might as well include it here too.)

I always thought the "billionaires are fundamentally evil" argument was pretty dumb but the "no one should have that much power" argument is looking pretty good right now.