* (no matter how mild)
* (no matter how mild)
Setting that aside, Trump's case for tariffs is NOT based on powers granted to him by Congress. LESS CUMBERSON and FASTER are not legal arguments - just red meat for MAGA.
Setting that aside, Trump's case for tariffs is NOT based on powers granted to him by Congress. LESS CUMBERSON and FASTER are not legal arguments - just red meat for MAGA.
And the legal system allows it to take place.
And the legal system allows it to take place.
It's been amazingly effective. He's a 24/7 high pressure salesman who will say anything, no matter how fanciful, conspiratorial, or plain stupid - to his followers. And the press doesn't know how to cover such a person.
It's been amazingly effective. He's a 24/7 high pressure salesman who will say anything, no matter how fanciful, conspiratorial, or plain stupid - to his followers. And the press doesn't know how to cover such a person.
Proper response to "I don't want to wear a mask" is, "You have to, in order to mitigate the pandemic".
Proper response to "I don't want to wear a mask" is, "You have to, in order to mitigate the pandemic".
Until then, Trump had minimal interest in foreign relations. So what happened?
Who knows? Kompromat? Real estate deals? Brainwashed by his Czech wife?
Until then, Trump had minimal interest in foreign relations. So what happened?
Who knows? Kompromat? Real estate deals? Brainwashed by his Czech wife?
1) Person A
2) Person B
3) Person C
4) Person D
5) Person E
6) Person F
7) Person G
8) Person H
9) Person I
10) Person J
11) Person K
1) Person A
2) Person B
3) Person C
4) Person D
5) Person E
6) Person F
7) Person G
8) Person H
9) Person I
10) Person J
11) Person K
It's the reverse. You can prosecute no matter what. No need for impeachment and conviction.
Trump's legal stooge.
It's the reverse. You can prosecute no matter what. No need for impeachment and conviction.
Trump's legal stooge.
His October essay about Trump's destruction of the west wing and plans for a ballroom mentioned "progressive" 6 times, "liberal" 3 times. His essay was focused on buildings erected by Democrats. There was limited mention of Trump's ambitions.
His October essay about Trump's destruction of the west wing and plans for a ballroom mentioned "progressive" 6 times, "liberal" 3 times. His essay was focused on buildings erected by Democrats. There was limited mention of Trump's ambitions.
It's childish and cartoon-y.
And it's no more different than mobster lingo, like "whack". But then, since this country is run by a gang of criminals, perhaps apt.
It's childish and cartoon-y.
And it's no more different than mobster lingo, like "whack". But then, since this country is run by a gang of criminals, perhaps apt.