It can be two things!

(And by “things” I mean “kinds of jounalistic malpractice.”)

Wallace Stevens sold insurance. You do what you have to do.

Eddie Murray?

Fresh pineapple (over canned) with jalapenos (preferably fresh but the brine also works) and pepperoni or ham is the way to go

I kind of understand how someone can get so high on their own supply that they think like this. What I don’t get on any level is how someone this delusional has just continually failed upward to the point I have to care what ridiculous things she believe.

If only there was something they could do besides quitting.

Hard agree. It feels like midnight at like 7.

“Hey, who’s the barber here?”

And the impact of a lot of horrible stuff hasn’t even hit yet. The Crazyfication Threshhold is in sight and may even be breached.

Another good question would be to ask them for a definition of “socialism,” because I can just about guarantee it’ll be both wrong and incoheren.

Cersei ahead of Tyrion, though?

Also the one with “Nuke the whales?” “Gotta nuke something!”

On a separate note I assume that a “tomfooler“ is “one who engages in tomfoolery” but would like an authoritative confirmation. (@merriam-webster.com, looking at you…)

Which is not to make any predictions about what the SC will do when they get a chance to weigh in! But under current gerrymandering law the CA move seems more likely to withstand a legal challeng.

I am by no means an expert on election tomfooler, but as I understand it-

1. The CA gerrymander isn’t tied to the TX gerrymander, and

B. The fact that the CA gerrymander was the result of a public initiative for partisan purposes makes it significantly different procedurally from TX.

talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/top-weine...