Blog: https://climate-change-and-ireland.ghost.io/
–Adjunct prof. Dublin City University
ORCID: 0000-0002-7995-6712;
–eNGO research & An Taisce member;
MSc. Sus Dev & BSc(Hon) Geology
30 yrs pro carpentry.
🚲 🏊
Why respect that?
Why respect that?
I see this as social engineering at scale, attacking common blind spots in people's psyches in order to consolidate power.
The risk is colossal.
I see this as social engineering at scale, attacking common blind spots in people's psyches in order to consolidate power.
The risk is colossal.
CCS plays a role, but it is strictly secondary, contributing a median of just 15–25%.
Technological neutrality is a political concept, not a scientific one.
2/3
CCS plays a role, but it is strictly secondary, contributing a median of just 15–25%.
Technological neutrality is a political concept, not a scientific one.
2/3
'It is too late for even a small chance of avoiding 1.5ºC without highly speculative tech, getting lucky with climate sensitivity and immediate global action'
www.antaisce.org/news/report-...
'It is too late for even a small chance of avoiding 1.5ºC without highly speculative tech, getting lucky with climate sensitivity and immediate global action'
www.antaisce.org/news/report-...
'It is too late for even a small chance of avoiding 1.5ºC without highly speculative tech, getting lucky with climate sensitivity and immediate global action'
www.antaisce.org/news/report-...
'It is too late for even a small chance of avoiding 1.5ºC without highly speculative tech, getting lucky with climate sensitivity and immediate global action'
www.antaisce.org/news/report-...
'It was disappointing that it was up to me rather than the senior climate scientists on the panel to correct these basic points in the Q&A afterward.'
docs.google.com/document/d/1...
'It was disappointing that it was up to me rather than the senior climate scientists on the panel to correct these basic points in the Q&A afterward.'
docs.google.com/document/d/1...
docs.google.com/document/d/1...
'it is hard to see how limiting warming to a high likelihood of less than 1.5ºC is even technically possible...because the required average global rate of emission cutting needed is already very high.'
docs.google.com/document/d/1...
'it is hard to see how limiting warming to a high likelihood of less than 1.5ºC is even technically possible...because the required average global rate of emission cutting needed is already very high.'