swaroopsy.bsky.social
@swaroopsy.bsky.social
6/6
Register here: www.corellium.com/mobile-secur...
This webinar is part of Corellium's Change What's Possible series.
#appsec #corellium #mobilesecurity #CyberSecurity
LinkedIn
This link will take you to a page that’s not on LinkedIn
lnkd.in
November 7, 2025 at 4:52 AM
5/6
Join me November 12th at 5pm ET for a webinar on what this means for your mobile security program in 2026. We'll cover the iOS visibility blackout, compliance challenges, and what's next for mobile AppSec.
November 7, 2025 at 4:52 AM
4/6
Without visibility into runtime behavior and exploit paths, how do you validate your app's security posture? Traditional mobile security testing methods are becoming obsolete.
November 7, 2025 at 4:52 AM
3/6
The FORCEDENTRY exploit allowed remote compromise of fully patched iPhones through malicious PDFs. These attacks succeeded because defenders couldn't see what was happening at runtime
November 7, 2025 at 4:52 AM
2/6
This isn't theoretical. Real incidents prove the cost.
Operation Triangulation in 2023 used a chain of iOS zero-days to install malware via iMessage. It went undetected for years.
November 7, 2025 at 4:52 AM
7/7
Knowing 40,000 vulnerabilities exist isn't useful.
Knowing which 5 actually threaten your app? That's everything.
The signal matters more than the noise.

#appsec #corellium #mobilesecurity #PenTesting
October 31, 2025 at 6:20 AM
6/7
@corellium.bsky.social research demonstrates virtualized testing as the path forward:
Spin up iOS devices with full system access. Reproduce the actual exploit. See if it works in YOUR app.
Test before shipping, not after the breach.
October 31, 2025 at 6:20 AM
5/7
"We think we're not vulnerable to this CVE but we can't really confirm it" is not a security strategy.
It's hope.
And hope doesn't hold up in compliance audits or incident reports.
October 31, 2025 at 6:20 AM
4/7
These weren't theories. They were weaponized
But here's the problem=most teams can't test for these in realistic conditions.
No jailbreak = no deep iOS testing Physical devices = doesn't scale Static scans = miss runtime behavior
You're basically guessing if you're vulnerable
October 31, 2025 at 6:20 AM
3/7
Meanwhile, real attacks are hitting production apps:
CVE-2024-26131: Stolen credentials via fake login screens CVE-2023-6542: Marketing SDK exposing private app files Operation Triangulation: iOS zero-days extracting messages and passwords with zero user interaction
October 31, 2025 at 6:20 AM
2/7
A CVE tells you a vulnerability exists somewhere. It doesn't tell you if YOUR app can be exploited.
Which library version are you using? Is that code even reachable? Does it matter in your environment?
The database describes problems. It doesn't prove impact.
October 31, 2025 at 6:20 AM
6/6
The answer isn't shadier downloads or buying phones from strangers.
It's legitimate virtualized environments that give real system access without the risk.
Test safe or don't test at all. #corellium #jailbreak #iOS
October 24, 2025 at 4:10 AM
5/6
Security teams are stuck in a bad spot:
Need deep iOS access for testing -> Can't jailbreak anymore -> Download random tools-> Get compromised

Traditional jailbreaking isn't coming back. The economics changed. The incentives flipped.
October 24, 2025 at 4:10 AM
4/6
Scammers saw the gap and filled it with fakes.

The original nekoJB from 2023 was legit - used real kernel exploits. This new "online" version just stole the name and reputation.

If someone promises an iOS 26 jailbreak, it's either fake or malicious. Period.
October 24, 2025 at 4:10 AM
3/6
Why are people falling for this?

Real jailbreaks are extinct. Security bounties now pay millions for exploits. Nobody releases public tools anymore when they can sell privately.

So desperate researchers download sketchy stuff from Reddit hoping something works.
October 24, 2025 at 4:10 AM
2/6
Zero kernel exploits. Zero privilege escalation. Zero actual jailbreak.

What it DOES have: root certificates that intercept all your device traffic. Every password. Every API call. Everything.

It's a phishing kit wearing a jailbreak costume.
October 24, 2025 at 4:10 AM
6/6: The question for every mobile security team:
Is your team ready to test on iOS 26.0.1 properly? Or are you shipping apps into the unknown?
Your app's security can't wait for a jailbreak that may never come.
#iOSSecurity #iOS26 #MobileAppSecurity #CyberSecurity #Corellium
October 17, 2025 at 5:24 AM
5/6: @corellium.bsky.social's virtual hardware platform.
They offer jailbroken iOS 26.0.1 on virtual devices including iPhone 17 Pro Max. No waiting for public exploits. No compromise on testing depth.
Root access across ALL iOS versions for comprehensive MAST.
October 17, 2025 at 5:24 AM
4/6: Here's the iOS security paradox:
Stronger OS security (great for users) makes it nearly impossible to do the deep security testing that keeps apps safe.
October 17, 2025 at 5:24 AM
3/6: The stakes have never been higher.
Recent AP investigations revealed zero-click attacks exploiting mobile devices with ZERO trace. CVEs have exploded from 7,000 to 40,000 annually.
Superficial testing just doesn't cut it anymore.
October 17, 2025 at 5:24 AM
2/6: Without jailbroken access, you're essentially testing blind:
No runtime app behavior inspection at OS level
No filesystem access for data leakage analysis
No deep vulnerability assessments
No testing for sophisticated attack vectors
October 17, 2025 at 5:24 AM