• https://www.patreon.com/Studio8502
• https://ko-fi.com/mos_8502
A conventional design puts those on the bottom, but I don't want to pay for double-sided assembly.
A conventional design puts those on the bottom, but I don't want to pay for double-sided assembly.
Big load off my mind, honestly.
Big load off my mind, honestly.
Still stuff to do. It will get revised based on feedback from the current spin, which hasn't even shipped yet, and I still have to go over the BOM and make sure it's right. Et cetera, et cetera.
Still stuff to do. It will get revised based on feedback from the current spin, which hasn't even shipped yet, and I still have to go over the BOM and make sure it's right. Et cetera, et cetera.
What do you think?
What do you think?
Maybe I'm just waiting for Stallman to die, I don't know.
Maybe I'm just waiting for Stallman to die, I don't know.
65-key keyboard -- basic tenkeyless layout, but with control to the left of "A", super and meta keys left and right of spacebar, and a "break" key in the upper right that generates an NMI when pressed.
65-key keyboard -- basic tenkeyless layout, but with control to the left of "A", super and meta keys left and right of spacebar, and a "break" key in the upper right that generates an NMI when pressed.
So I punted, and more or less duplicated most of the C64 key matrix. Differences exist, since there isn't a 1:1 correspondence, but it worked out fine.
So I punted, and more or less duplicated most of the C64 key matrix. Differences exist, since there isn't a 1:1 correspondence, but it worked out fine.
The theory of operation is thus: Each key is an individual switch, pulled up via a resistor. On press, the key is grounded. Each key goes to an individual input on a CD4021 shift register, one per notional "column".
The theory of operation is thus: Each key is an individual switch, pulled up via a resistor. On press, the key is grounded. Each key goes to an individual input on a CD4021 shift register, one per notional "column".