Also good to know that more than a century later, we're still just as male-gazey as we were back then. /s
Also good to know that more than a century later, we're still just as male-gazey as we were back then. /s
(end)
(end)
Having found that Ms. Halligan’s appointment violated 28 U.S.C. § 546 and the Appointments Clause and that dismissal of Ms. James’s indictment is warranted, the remaining issue is whether dismissal should be with or without prejudice.
Having found that Ms. Halligan’s appointment violated 28 U.S.C. § 546 and the Appointments Clause and that dismissal of Ms. James’s indictment is warranted, the remaining issue is whether dismissal should be with or without prejudice.
bsky.app/profile/stre...
bsky.app/profile/stre...