ST (outwardly): You fool, you imbecile. What have you done? You know nothing! I am already spread too thin. ST (inwardly): Hi hi. Scheming intensifies.
November 28, 2025 at 9:12 AM
ST (outwardly): You fool, you imbecile. What have you done? You know nothing! I am already spread too thin. ST (inwardly): Hi hi. Scheming intensifies.
My naive hope is that THIS WHOLE THING will make us rethink what matters, academically. The ubiquity of papers TRYING to look like THE KIND OF THING that gets published was a problem long before AI started doing it.
November 28, 2025 at 7:53 AM
My naive hope is that THIS WHOLE THING will make us rethink what matters, academically. The ubiquity of papers TRYING to look like THE KIND OF THING that gets published was a problem long before AI started doing it.
i agree with the framing. I don’t think that’s going to work though because it relies on the implicit moral argument that everyone should be able to participate with dignity. Opponents are just going to say: why should I pay for what is morally abhorrent. It is part of the anti abortion rhetoric.
November 26, 2025 at 12:28 AM
i agree with the framing. I don’t think that’s going to work though because it relies on the implicit moral argument that everyone should be able to participate with dignity. Opponents are just going to say: why should I pay for what is morally abhorrent. It is part of the anti abortion rhetoric.
I happen to know the Maastricht accounting department quite well. And I am not surprised. I am in two minds. There is a difference between the journals definitely. On the other hand, people in financial economics could benefit from reading more accounting. So rewarding those pubs somehow is not bad.
November 25, 2025 at 8:46 AM
I happen to know the Maastricht accounting department quite well. And I am not surprised. I am in two minds. There is a difference between the journals definitely. On the other hand, people in financial economics could benefit from reading more accounting. So rewarding those pubs somehow is not bad.
Being serious for a minute. I am really grateful for your paper and have been sharing it a lot with students or when I review papers (and I'll keep doing that!). I just never realised that making it dryer and publishing it was an option.
November 25, 2025 at 7:14 AM
Being serious for a minute. I am really grateful for your paper and have been sharing it a lot with students or when I review papers (and I'll keep doing that!). I just never realised that making it dryer and publishing it was an option.
We are a bit slower and conservative 😅 . You will be pleased to know that we discovered in the last decade that people might have different personalities and that might impact how they make business decisions.
November 25, 2025 at 5:23 AM
We are a bit slower and conservative 😅 . You will be pleased to know that we discovered in the last decade that people might have different personalities and that might impact how they make business decisions.
Esslemont does low grade body horror quite well for me and that fits quite will with the setting of the last two novels. The two novels also explore the themes of what to do with indigenous cultures and nature in a changing world which is an undercurrent of DoD and TCG.
November 25, 2025 at 5:20 AM
Esslemont does low grade body horror quite well for me and that fits quite will with the setting of the last two novels. The two novels also explore the themes of what to do with indigenous cultures and nature in a changing world which is an undercurrent of DoD and TCG.
I quite like the last two books in the novels. Be warned we have quite different tastes. I really, really enjoyed Forge of Darkness for instance and I was moved by the Kiska and Tay story line in the novels.
November 25, 2025 at 5:16 AM
I quite like the last two books in the novels. Be warned we have quite different tastes. I really, really enjoyed Forge of Darkness for instance and I was moved by the Kiska and Tay story line in the novels.
But I do see certain choices by OpenAI as political (maybe not even deliberately) choices. I think they see no harm in undermining academia and education and that is reflected in ChatGPT.
November 24, 2025 at 3:22 AM
But I do see certain choices by OpenAI as political (maybe not even deliberately) choices. I think they see no harm in undermining academia and education and that is reflected in ChatGPT.