Lana Rhoades Scholar
@sneerreview.bsky.social
top 1% content creator on my mom's fridge
Reposted by Lana Rhoades Scholar
Sorry to make it worse but there's a part of the WSJ article that no one is talking about that I had to share with someone.
![The Epstein estate also turned over another letter from the book that references Trump. It came from businessman and longtime Mar-a-Lago member Joel Pashcow, who made a crude joke about a woman that Trump and Epstein socialized with in the 1990s, according to people familiar with the matter.
The Pashcow letter included a photo of a posterboard-sized check for $22,500, which had been mocked up to appear that it was sent from Trump to Epstein. Beneath it, a handwritten caption said: “Jeffrey showing early talents with money + women sells ‘fully depreciated’ [redacted] to Donald Trump for $22,500.” The woman’s name is redacted in the image.
Photo of three men holding a check for $22,500 made out to Jeffrey Epstein, with handwritten notes discussing the transaction.
Pashcow and his attorney didn’t respond to requests for comment. A lawyer for the woman said she doesn’t know Pashcow and has no knowledge of the letter naming her, which the lawyer called a “disgusting and deeply disturbing hoax.”](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:owcnopiqb2bosqpstucesxu5/bafkreibfdetqc3ckntju6btkbzvayh2tminrwgfg2j5vpvbhfkvriczqjm@jpeg)
![Letter which reads: "Jeffary showing early talents with money + Women! Sells "Fully depreciated" [Name Redacted] to Donald Trump for 22,500$. Showed early "people skilld" too. Even though I handled the deal I didn't get any of the money on the girl!](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:owcnopiqb2bosqpstucesxu5/bafkreiele2fsi5dxx7hztlfv23hgh54cptbsubdoeg6mijciyoqwn4vpmq@jpeg)
September 8, 2025 at 8:47 PM
Sorry to make it worse but there's a part of the WSJ article that no one is talking about that I had to share with someone.
Maybe the greater threat is the public just not caring by 2029. If they don't feel personally impacted by them then it's highly motivated rent-seekers and more revenue vs a shrug. I think voters will happily link these tariffs to inflation, unlike Trump 45's.
August 3, 2025 at 11:44 PM
Maybe the greater threat is the public just not caring by 2029. If they don't feel personally impacted by them then it's highly motivated rent-seekers and more revenue vs a shrug. I think voters will happily link these tariffs to inflation, unlike Trump 45's.
"Co-partisan approval"
It's 4% of Democrats
It's 4% of Democrats
August 3, 2025 at 11:35 PM
"Co-partisan approval"
It's 4% of Democrats
It's 4% of Democrats
Reposted by Lana Rhoades Scholar
The Republican Party is protecting a pedophile in order to induce a recession.
August 3, 2025 at 10:44 PM
The Republican Party is protecting a pedophile in order to induce a recession.
I was going to make a joke about how Nickelback deserves the hate for being from Alberta but then I remember where Creed was founded
May 14, 2025 at 9:54 PM
I was going to make a joke about how Nickelback deserves the hate for being from Alberta but then I remember where Creed was founded
You know I'm right
May 14, 2025 at 9:48 PM
You know I'm right
Creed is for people who like dogs and people dogs like
May 14, 2025 at 9:23 PM
Creed is for people who like dogs and people dogs like
Where in Maine was this?
March 22, 2025 at 6:11 PM
Where in Maine was this?