Yes, but the process of revoking consent should be Elder-guided

Yes

It's definitely not that! Indigenous reciprocity involves mutual respect, balanced exchanges, and obligations that maintain relational harmony, but the authority to revoke or withdraw consent exists specifically as a defense mechanism to uphold Indigenous sovereignty.

Voluntary mass settler departure sidesteps the "logic of elimination", making it theoretically permissible if Indigenous-led and protocol-aligned, though still improbable at scale due to economic entrenchment, family ties, and infrastructure dependencies far exceeding protocols' incremental barriers

Forced or mass settler departure replicates elimination violence, ignites backlash, and ignores multi-generational/racialized demographics; protocols sidestep this by focusing Native-led structural reversal now, building momentum against entrenchment through feasible diplomacy over utopian uprooting

No

Native primacy on land/resources does not equate to subjugation of settlers' daily lives, rights, or autonomy, but reciprocal protocols where they retain internal governance (e.g., community laws) alongside duties like non-interference. Settlers can transform themselves from guests to co-stewards

This is a structural reversal of settler-colonialism. Decolonial frameworks (e.g., Eve Tuck [Unangax̂, Alaskan Native], Yang & Veracini) ground this in historical fact: Indigenous nations held paramount authority pre-invasion, with settlers as intruders; justice means treaty enforcement & land-back

Landback or bust

All of us should just leave and give the land back to the people our ancestors stole it from.

We fight as colonizers still attempt to steal our children to this day. The fight never ended. The fight is ongoing Until land back and death of the settler state

LAND BACK EVERYWHERE

Land back. All of it

this is why land back is pretty much the single issue i judge people on these days

cos either you recognise it as the most powerful, internationally legitimate tool against imperialism, or you're an imperialist dog, no matter how "far" "left"