I’m assuming we’re in rule of threes joke territory and I am curious what the writers throw at is next

“Convince white people that Boston is a structurally racial city with terrible cops” is the boss fight and I still haven’t beat the “convince white people that Asheville has espevially violent cops” miniboss

It's pretty possible to do untrusted-contributer-no-review workflows in GitHub using things like CODEOWNERS carefully and effectively, but github classroom just doesn't seem to support this well.

The ICE resistance in suburban Chicago has convinced me not all suburbs are created equal and that Illinois can have little a suburbs as a treat

God thats bleak and basically emblematic of why I gave up on Atlanta.

I’ve perhaps grown past the “fuck everyone in red states” phase but when SPLOST failed I basically decided “Atlanta wants to choke in its own vomit for two generation, have at it I’ll never be back”

clicked on the thread because your re-transition comment didn’t seem woke enough to be your most woke opinion but you got cooking downthread (laudatory)

Huh! Wonder why I convinced myself that worked

The absolute wild thing is that this vote won’t release any files! This is legislation; it still has to pass the senate and is subject to veto before it becomes law.

The intensity with which Johnson and the White House have fought this *almost certainly only symbolic* gesture is absolutely insane.

Though maybe this is actually the primary GOP playbook for healthcare for a decade: make things so much dramatically worse so that Rick Perry’s plan is an improvement over the new status quo - but it hasn’t actually been executed at this scale.

I do believe the most significant political move that Trump blindly stumbled upon in his second term was “create big problems and then solve them halfway and take credit for the solution” and I think a disciplined person (at least on the right but maybe also on left) could wield that scary well

this makes sense but I’m kind of rooting for the standards bodies rejecting this route out of a pointless pettiness towards MSFT

I agree - but the bar is gonna be what Node does now, and what the standards body can provide in some sense has to be not jsdoc not current TS but a secret third thing and this proposal hasn’t foguee that out yet imo

I get this view, see my other replies. BUT with stable Node type stripping we’re now locked in to a de-facto-specifically-TS stripping spec outside of standards bodies.

Backing out of this is going to be difficult at the level of fixing ES Modules across browser/ts/node incompatible (non-)standards

(I also think it doesn’t happen until you deal with JSX as well, which… yipes)

That said, I think the committee’s apparent strong reluctance to put this in the standard makes a lot of sense. I‘d put the over/under at 2030 for something like this and I think it’ll look quite a bit different than this proposal or present-day TypeScript.

Its so revolutionary to be able to do this in Node, and when 22 goes EOL in 2027 and there’s kind of no reason not to have your npm libraries contain .ts files only it gets *really* interesting.