This project came out of a wonderful collaboration with @juliachae.bsky.social (my co-first-author) along with Yonglong Tian, @sarameghanbeery.bsky.social , and @phillipisola.bsky.social .

(n/n)

For more results, analysis, and discussion, check out our paper!

Our code, evaluation datasets, and ~100 GB of synthetic datasets are all available on our Github. You can also find the PODS dataset on HuggingFace.

Our project page: personalized-rep.github.io

(10/n)

What if we had collected more than 3 real images initially?

We compare DINOv2-P performance trained on real only vs real + syn, as the real dataset size scales. Even as real-trained performance saturates, synthetic data still leads to performance improvements!

(9/n)

T2I models can be expensive though – can we get similar results with cheaper methods?

Yes! We get comparable performance with Cut/Paste, which is much computationally cheaper. T2I models are useful for getting the best possible performance, creating a cost/benefit tradeoff.

(8/n)

Across backbones, datasets and tasks, *personalized reps (-P) consistently outperform general reps* (green = better performance).

Relative improvements (avg across datasets) can be significant: DINOv2 detection +48%, CLIP Retrieval +34%, MAE classification +106%.

(7/n)

First, some qualitative results:

Dense prediction maps from personalized reps highlight and localize the target object much more clearly than pretrained reps, even with occlusions or similar nearby objects.

(object highlighted in test images for visualization)

(6/n)

What about datasets?

Introducing *PODS: Personal Object Discrimination Suite* - a dataset for personalized vision with 100 objects and 4 test splits w/ distribution shifts to test generalization!

We also reformulate DogFaceNet and DeepFashion2 for real-world evaluation.

(5/n)

For eval, we apply personalized representations to four tasks (classification, retrieval, detection, segmentation) using classic few-shot setups, and compare them to pretrained models.

(4/n)

We introduce a 3-step training pipeline:

1. Prepare a personalized generator (e.g. DreamBooth) using the small real-image dataset.
2. Generate positives (target instance) and negatives (images of same object type).
3. Contrastively fine-tune a general-purpose model w/ LoRA

(3/n)

First, we introduce *personalized-representations*: general-purpose vision representations specialized to a target object.

Personalized reps separate the target object from all other objects and can be flexibly applied to diverse downstream tasks involving that object.

(2/n)