Even granting that Tom Crewe has identified stylistic and other flaws in OV's writing, I would've expected the critique to engage with the question why OV is so admired by many, despite these flaws. Or to even just ask that question.

"He had to wait almost four hours for an ambulance to take him to get treatment for a third-degree burn he got while working in the kitchen to make money to call his family" is not a sentence that can be written about a humane society.

On a slightly different issue, same pattern: