Timothy Schwarzauer
@schwatd.bsky.social
Leftist redneck from Mississippi and now NC. Brewing beer and making wine in a barn for a non profit brewery and winery is a lot better than wearing a suit all day in a Federal Courthouse
That's factually incorrect. Did you read any of the actual case?
December 8, 2025 at 1:09 AM
That's factually incorrect. Did you read any of the actual case?
Your hatred for consent is duly noted.
December 6, 2025 at 3:16 AM
Your hatred for consent is duly noted.
Could you specify the false statement of fact you're thinking of?
December 6, 2025 at 1:52 AM
Could you specify the false statement of fact you're thinking of?
This is really embarrassing for you.
December 6, 2025 at 1:19 AM
This is really embarrassing for you.
I mean you assume $30k a year in disposable income at a 52 week/year and you get some 576 dollars a week. Even in the most sales tax happy jurisdictions that's still $500+ in real purchasing power.
December 5, 2025 at 2:54 AM
I mean you assume $30k a year in disposable income at a 52 week/year and you get some 576 dollars a week. Even in the most sales tax happy jurisdictions that's still $500+ in real purchasing power.
The 500 is the weekly stipend which less than the 30k in disposable income in a year.
December 5, 2025 at 2:42 AM
The 500 is the weekly stipend which less than the 30k in disposable income in a year.
I would like to introduce you to the Mississippi Delta. You're not struggling or impoverished.
December 5, 2025 at 2:35 AM
I would like to introduce you to the Mississippi Delta. You're not struggling or impoverished.
Just in time for it to be too cold to sit outside!
December 4, 2025 at 2:56 PM
Just in time for it to be too cold to sit outside!
This wouldn't qualify as slander in the US.
December 3, 2025 at 6:34 PM
This wouldn't qualify as slander in the US.
You believe law firms are EOIR judges?
December 1, 2025 at 12:49 PM
You believe law firms are EOIR judges?
So we are back to: you believe it is better that rich people like JK Rowling use the force of government to silence critics.
December 1, 2025 at 12:47 PM
So we are back to: you believe it is better that rich people like JK Rowling use the force of government to silence critics.
Oh, honey. Bless your heart. You're commenting on a year old post.
November 30, 2025 at 3:00 PM
Oh, honey. Bless your heart. You're commenting on a year old post.
"Mexico" is not the name of the country.
November 29, 2025 at 1:04 PM
"Mexico" is not the name of the country.
That's...not even remotely true.
November 27, 2025 at 11:59 PM
That's...not even remotely true.
Yes. You can in fact tell fire in a crowded room. Who told you that you couldn't and why did you believe them?
November 27, 2025 at 11:58 PM
Yes. You can in fact tell fire in a crowded room. Who told you that you couldn't and why did you believe them?
Literally no one has said that they didn't.
November 26, 2025 at 11:40 PM
Literally no one has said that they didn't.
You're begging the question in assuming there is such an issue to begin with.
November 26, 2025 at 8:39 PM
You're begging the question in assuming there is such an issue to begin with.
So when I specifically stated that it might apply outside of the US, that was me ignoring the existence of laws outside of the US?
November 26, 2025 at 8:25 PM
So when I specifically stated that it might apply outside of the US, that was me ignoring the existence of laws outside of the US?
I wholly enjoy American exceptionalism. I certainly wouldn't want to be subject to speech laws of the UK, for example.
November 26, 2025 at 8:24 PM
I wholly enjoy American exceptionalism. I certainly wouldn't want to be subject to speech laws of the UK, for example.
The issue here is that unless someone was advocating for the government to retaliate, then there is no hypocrisy and is no First Amendment implications that you claimed existed.
November 26, 2025 at 8:19 PM
The issue here is that unless someone was advocating for the government to retaliate, then there is no hypocrisy and is no First Amendment implications that you claimed existed.
Okay, so when you stated I was wrong, it is because you believed I was talking about wholly irrelevant topics to the thing that I explicitly stated?
November 26, 2025 at 8:18 PM
Okay, so when you stated I was wrong, it is because you believed I was talking about wholly irrelevant topics to the thing that I explicitly stated?
Are you confused by the concept of a question?
November 26, 2025 at 8:17 PM
Are you confused by the concept of a question?
That isn't what was stated, though. That appears to be a statement that only exists in the voices in your own head.
November 26, 2025 at 8:15 PM
That isn't what was stated, though. That appears to be a statement that only exists in the voices in your own head.