SaukFish
@saukfish.bsky.social
Puget Sound island dweller. Tired lawyer. Increasingly entropic.
Bradley is America's Heinz-Wilhelm Eck. But Bradley will get some sort of medal from this disgusting, murderous regime instead of the penalty Eck got and Bradley deserves.
December 5, 2025 at 5:22 AM
Bradley is America's Heinz-Wilhelm Eck. But Bradley will get some sort of medal from this disgusting, murderous regime instead of the penalty Eck got and Bradley deserves.
Alito’s sneering contempt for anyone — including, in this case, two district court judges — who would come to any form of conclusion that isn’t his has become intolerable.
He is a horrible man.
He is a horrible man.
December 5, 2025 at 2:37 AM
Alito’s sneering contempt for anyone — including, in this case, two district court judges — who would come to any form of conclusion that isn’t his has become intolerable.
He is a horrible man.
He is a horrible man.
For anyone who has spent his or her life in the law, as I have for the past 35 years, the proposition that matters of this magnitude would be decided by fiat – with a little more than an unexplained wave of the hand - is a direct affront to the rule of law.
December 5, 2025 at 12:33 AM
For anyone who has spent his or her life in the law, as I have for the past 35 years, the proposition that matters of this magnitude would be decided by fiat – with a little more than an unexplained wave of the hand - is a direct affront to the rule of law.
I’m sorry, but these fucking people. That this Court can casually wave away a District Court’s exceptionally detailed and comprehensive finding of racial motivation because . . . well, they just know better . . . is fucking nauseating.
I’ve practiced law for 35 years, and this Court makes me sick.
I’ve practiced law for 35 years, and this Court makes me sick.
December 5, 2025 at 12:13 AM
I’m sorry, but these fucking people. That this Court can casually wave away a District Court’s exceptionally detailed and comprehensive finding of racial motivation because . . . well, they just know better . . . is fucking nauseating.
I’ve practiced law for 35 years, and this Court makes me sick.
I’ve practiced law for 35 years, and this Court makes me sick.
Pammie should stick to indicting those ham sandwiches. They’re easier than real people whose only offense is having had the nerve to hold Trump to account.
December 4, 2025 at 11:14 PM
Pammie should stick to indicting those ham sandwiches. They’re easier than real people whose only offense is having had the nerve to hold Trump to account.
His eyebrows have been awarded their own medals.
December 4, 2025 at 11:09 PM
His eyebrows have been awarded their own medals.
A thing of perfect, unsullied beauty.
December 4, 2025 at 11:08 PM
A thing of perfect, unsullied beauty.
This dyspeptic old cretinous fuck is an embarrassment to everything good about this country.
Good God, how did we get here?
Good God, how did we get here?
December 4, 2025 at 11:06 PM
This dyspeptic old cretinous fuck is an embarrassment to everything good about this country.
Good God, how did we get here?
Good God, how did we get here?
Thoughts running through the minds of the vast majority of good, decent, law-abiding American service men and women: (i) this is horrible business, and if Bradley did this, he should be held responsible; and (ii) Pete Hegseth is a goddam ass-covering shitbird coward.
December 2, 2025 at 7:59 PM
Thoughts running through the minds of the vast majority of good, decent, law-abiding American service men and women: (i) this is horrible business, and if Bradley did this, he should be held responsible; and (ii) Pete Hegseth is a goddam ass-covering shitbird coward.
There is no non-corrupt explanation for this. None.
December 2, 2025 at 7:52 PM
There is no non-corrupt explanation for this. None.
If I see a madman on the street assaulting pedestrians, but the NYT reports only that emergency room admissions are high this morning, to report on the madman isn’t to validate my views. It is to tell the friggin’ truth.
The NYT simply refuses to confront the fact that Trump is the madman.
The NYT simply refuses to confront the fact that Trump is the madman.
December 2, 2025 at 4:28 PM
If I see a madman on the street assaulting pedestrians, but the NYT reports only that emergency room admissions are high this morning, to report on the madman isn’t to validate my views. It is to tell the friggin’ truth.
The NYT simply refuses to confront the fact that Trump is the madman.
The NYT simply refuses to confront the fact that Trump is the madman.
The SCOTUS just told this POTUS that he's free to commit crimes so long as he pretends to be presidenting while he commits them (and he's taking full advantage of the opportunity). It's staggeringly unfair, but there is just no universe in which Hegseth will suffer a real penalty for any of this.
December 2, 2025 at 5:32 AM
The SCOTUS just told this POTUS that he's free to commit crimes so long as he pretends to be presidenting while he commits them (and he's taking full advantage of the opportunity). It's staggeringly unfair, but there is just no universe in which Hegseth will suffer a real penalty for any of this.
You should go ahead and engage with the customer service chatbot on this. That always seems to provide satisfaction, no?
December 2, 2025 at 12:45 AM
You should go ahead and engage with the customer service chatbot on this. That always seems to provide satisfaction, no?
"Back, back, everybody . . . just take a few steps back. Those wheels are really wobbly and we don’t want anyone to get hit when they come flying off. Just give it some room."
December 2, 2025 at 12:41 AM
"Back, back, everybody . . . just take a few steps back. Those wheels are really wobbly and we don’t want anyone to get hit when they come flying off. Just give it some room."
I have a feeling that, unless this miserable shitbird dies before it all plays out, John Roberts is going to have to explain what the hell footnote 3 of Trump v. United States actually means.
Everything we’re seeing now places it and Barrett’s concurrence front and center.
Everything we’re seeing now places it and Barrett’s concurrence front and center.
December 1, 2025 at 10:51 PM
I have a feeling that, unless this miserable shitbird dies before it all plays out, John Roberts is going to have to explain what the hell footnote 3 of Trump v. United States actually means.
Everything we’re seeing now places it and Barrett’s concurrence front and center.
Everything we’re seeing now places it and Barrett’s concurrence front and center.
Chuck Schumer is having a coronary, because Kelly hadn’t cleared this with the pollsters before going public with it.
December 1, 2025 at 10:16 PM
Chuck Schumer is having a coronary, because Kelly hadn’t cleared this with the pollsters before going public with it.
It is stomach-churning that this sort of cretinous garbage could come from someone standing behind a White House podium.
Of course, this woman is simply a moron and not to be taken seriously, but this "theory" would authorize any form of violence, any time, for any purpose, against anyone.
Of course, this woman is simply a moron and not to be taken seriously, but this "theory" would authorize any form of violence, any time, for any purpose, against anyone.
December 1, 2025 at 7:45 PM
It is stomach-churning that this sort of cretinous garbage could come from someone standing behind a White House podium.
Of course, this woman is simply a moron and not to be taken seriously, but this "theory" would authorize any form of violence, any time, for any purpose, against anyone.
Of course, this woman is simply a moron and not to be taken seriously, but this "theory" would authorize any form of violence, any time, for any purpose, against anyone.
“It’s the President’s Club. You can’t be arresting Presidents. John Roberts told me that.”
December 1, 2025 at 12:04 AM
“It’s the President’s Club. You can’t be arresting Presidents. John Roberts told me that.”
And now they’ll hang the subordinates out to dry. Just low-rent fucks from top to bottom.
November 30, 2025 at 11:59 PM
And now they’ll hang the subordinates out to dry. Just low-rent fucks from top to bottom.
Who gets an MRI and has no idea why? Everything about this man is a festival of horseshit.
November 30, 2025 at 11:43 PM
Who gets an MRI and has no idea why? Everything about this man is a festival of horseshit.
We are squarely amid the reign of the fucking stupid people. It will pass eventually, because stupidity is inherently self-defeating, but the process will be incredibly painful.
November 30, 2025 at 10:35 PM
We are squarely amid the reign of the fucking stupid people. It will pass eventually, because stupidity is inherently self-defeating, but the process will be incredibly painful.
Judge Boasberg will understand very clearly what this is.
The DC Circuit and the Supreme Court? Well, that’s where despair sets in.
The DC Circuit and the Supreme Court? Well, that’s where despair sets in.
November 30, 2025 at 6:29 PM
Judge Boasberg will understand very clearly what this is.
The DC Circuit and the Supreme Court? Well, that’s where despair sets in.
The DC Circuit and the Supreme Court? Well, that’s where despair sets in.