Saskatoon Jam
@saskatoonjam.bsky.social
Posts about the law and freedom to thrive in community.
Antifa's lawyer.
Antifa's lawyer.
You made me go find the results web page: results.elections.ab.ca/8487
Unofficial Results - 2025 Elections Alberta By-Elections
results.elections.ab.ca
June 24, 2025 at 3:23 AM
You made me go find the results web page: results.elections.ab.ca/8487
Reposted by Saskatoon Jam
Huge shout out to everyone in the US legal community waging battle after battle to preserve democracy and protect the people! ❤️🔥
May 29, 2025 at 3:00 PM
Huge shout out to everyone in the US legal community waging battle after battle to preserve democracy and protect the people! ❤️🔥
Mad he failed to bush fire the whole of government and mad at the natural consequences of his own behavior
This is a person who will CONTINUE to hold enormous power: X, Starlink, AI, political financing
👀
This is a person who will CONTINUE to hold enormous power: X, Starlink, AI, political financing
👀
May 29, 2025 at 2:58 PM
Mad he failed to bush fire the whole of government and mad at the natural consequences of his own behavior
This is a person who will CONTINUE to hold enormous power: X, Starlink, AI, political financing
👀
This is a person who will CONTINUE to hold enormous power: X, Starlink, AI, political financing
👀
Carter Hart giving evidence now (according to CBC), testifying that the sexual contact he had with EM was consensual. That means the defence is either 'there was actual communicated consent to the specific touching freely given at the time' OR he had an honest but mistaken belief it was consensual
May 29, 2025 at 2:54 PM
Carter Hart giving evidence now (according to CBC), testifying that the sexual contact he had with EM was consensual. That means the defence is either 'there was actual communicated consent to the specific touching freely given at the time' OR he had an honest but mistaken belief it was consensual
A few additional thoughts (ie legal info):
- the accused are not necessarily coordinating their defence
- the Crown has introduced some accuseds' statements to police which jury can consider whether or not they testify
- one accused can testify against another (called a "cut throat defence")
- the accused are not necessarily coordinating their defence
- the Crown has introduced some accuseds' statements to police which jury can consider whether or not they testify
- one accused can testify against another (called a "cut throat defence")
May 29, 2025 at 2:50 PM
A few additional thoughts (ie legal info):
- the accused are not necessarily coordinating their defence
- the Crown has introduced some accuseds' statements to police which jury can consider whether or not they testify
- one accused can testify against another (called a "cut throat defence")
- the accused are not necessarily coordinating their defence
- the Crown has introduced some accuseds' statements to police which jury can consider whether or not they testify
- one accused can testify against another (called a "cut throat defence")