Yup. Turned me right away and against it to be honest. There for the powerful, at the expense of the weak. Juries help to mitigate that by giving a spread of people, not just an insulated judge looking down from on high

WTAF??? :-O

Also never been a man. I did try though (I was like really bad at it 🤣)

Just wanna give a shout out to trans men, intersex men, black men, gay men, disabled men, working class men, who definitely have it far worse than the cishet abled middle class white men who rule this country
This is your day

Ah yes, like your PM, or you health secretary attacking trans people, or your new Home Secretary who's trying to out-Braverman Priti Patel's actions.

You should join the Green Party before it's too late to escape to smear of ReformRot at the centre of the '20s Labour Party

Wow.

It's like Robert Galbraith is his role model.

Write something successful. Say a lot of awful shit about a minority group. Have the actors turn against your bullshit.

Never demonstrate the reflective capacity to realise the problem actually is you

Yeah that would definitely be immediately turned round to 'i can't believe you're oppressing cis people by calling them cis!' or some such rubbish - and then that tenure track trans professor hired to teach gender studies gets fired.

Trillionaire gives away less than 0.5% of his money to things he controls, so basically he did a tax dodge to increase his power, or something?

My what exceptional news you provide!

what a horrible human.

Sounds lovely?

Although also, if you're adhd, it's never silent. Like a nonstop chacophony of my thoughts reverberating around my skull tugging me in all the directions at once.

What would silence and time and space between even feel like???

And sometimes, she's a trans woman too ;-)

read it out loud.

It engages a different part of your brain when you do it, and you see now things from it.

Also, get someone else to read it to you. Again, gives you new perspective

Also, take a break after writing it, at least a few days, so you come at it fresh again

" the April UK Supreme Court ruling that defines women by their “biological sex” rather than their identity, a bill drafted by the Ehrc"

If you'd said instead "that reduces women to their observed genitalia at birth or 'biological sex", rather than their identity"

You'd have been just as true

And the UK is slowly following suit www.thepinknews.com/2025/10/24/e...

^this