Rob Tesh
@robtesh.bsky.social
PhD candidate @Dundee University researching the psychology of learning, teacher trainer, experience designer, writer, bus driver, eco-zealot, anarcho-communist. NB (any pronouns).
Reposted by Rob Tesh
uber-wokes, net-zeroists, rejoinerists, corbynites, neo-corbynites, crypto corbynites, Chinese restaurants, why do you think Windsor Castle is ringed with Chinese restaurants?
February 9, 2026 at 9:00 AM
uber-wokes, net-zeroists, rejoinerists, corbynites, neo-corbynites, crypto corbynites, Chinese restaurants, why do you think Windsor Castle is ringed with Chinese restaurants?
Reposted by Rob Tesh
I dunno, maybe if you're given national political responsibility and you demonstrate significant incompetence or lack of integrity, that should be that? There's a lot of people in Britain who are both trustworthy and competent, maybe we could give them a go
February 8, 2026 at 5:31 PM
I dunno, maybe if you're given national political responsibility and you demonstrate significant incompetence or lack of integrity, that should be that? There's a lot of people in Britain who are both trustworthy and competent, maybe we could give them a go
Reposted by Rob Tesh
Not just that but Tolkien also said, “Evil cannot create anything new, it can only corrupt and ruin what good forces have invented or made.”
Sound familiar? 🙄
Sound familiar? 🙄
December 18, 2025 at 3:18 AM
Not just that but Tolkien also said, “Evil cannot create anything new, it can only corrupt and ruin what good forces have invented or made.”
Sound familiar? 🙄
Sound familiar? 🙄
Reposted by Rob Tesh
Richard Dawkins. Steven Pinker. Lawrence Krauss. Jonathan Haidt. Robert Trivers. Prominent atheists and scientists who have pushed anti-trans propaganda for years. They all had ties to Jeffrey Epstein. Some received huge research grants and island trips, and all of them benefited from their ties.
You’re not crazy. The anti-trans movement is not organic; it was funded by pedophilic billionaires like Jeffrey Epstein who backed a network of conservatives to accuse the same people they were sexually abusing of being the real danger. @madycast.com exposes the truth in our in-depth report.
Epstein Backed ‘Billionaires’ Dinner’ Network of Prominent Anti-Trans Figures
Lawrence Krauss, Richard Dawkins, Steven Pinker and other anti-trans influencers personally benefited from a right-wing academic social group backed by infamous human trafficker Jeffrey Epstein, somet...
transnews.network
February 6, 2026 at 8:13 PM
Richard Dawkins. Steven Pinker. Lawrence Krauss. Jonathan Haidt. Robert Trivers. Prominent atheists and scientists who have pushed anti-trans propaganda for years. They all had ties to Jeffrey Epstein. Some received huge research grants and island trips, and all of them benefited from their ties.
Reposted by Rob Tesh
Instead of defining success by conversion, by numbers, or media representation, success in my insurrectionary anarchist feminism is defined by my values, my relationships, my actions, my capacity, and how they all might be leveraged to undermine regime and expand agency for those on the margins.
February 4, 2026 at 3:58 PM
Instead of defining success by conversion, by numbers, or media representation, success in my insurrectionary anarchist feminism is defined by my values, my relationships, my actions, my capacity, and how they all might be leveraged to undermine regime and expand agency for those on the margins.
I bet the extra row is for the "going to" future - but if they want to be *really* complete they should add an extra row for "was going to" and then there would be twenty.
It's all daft though, you can keep expanding the list forever because it's much messier than this. Only two real tenses though.
It's all daft though, you can keep expanding the list forever because it's much messier than this. Only two real tenses though.
February 5, 2026 at 7:07 AM
I bet the extra row is for the "going to" future - but if they want to be *really* complete they should add an extra row for "was going to" and then there would be twenty.
It's all daft though, you can keep expanding the list forever because it's much messier than this. Only two real tenses though.
It's all daft though, you can keep expanding the list forever because it's much messier than this. Only two real tenses though.
Reposted by Rob Tesh
It's that it's impossible to accumulate that kind of wealth without being evil.
You need to be able to see other people's lives as more disposable than yours in order to justify exploiting them.
And you can't make that kind of money without exploiting people.
You need to be able to see other people's lives as more disposable than yours in order to justify exploiting them.
And you can't make that kind of money without exploiting people.
February 2, 2026 at 5:09 PM
It's that it's impossible to accumulate that kind of wealth without being evil.
You need to be able to see other people's lives as more disposable than yours in order to justify exploiting them.
And you can't make that kind of money without exploiting people.
You need to be able to see other people's lives as more disposable than yours in order to justify exploiting them.
And you can't make that kind of money without exploiting people.
Reposted by Rob Tesh
How can it be that it all just comes down to "they're chasers and if trans people have rights they're harder to sex traffic?"
THEY STARTED A FUCKING GENOCIDE BECAUSE THEY WANTED SEX SLAVES!
Jesus fucking Christ how can the world be this dumb.
THEY STARTED A FUCKING GENOCIDE BECAUSE THEY WANTED SEX SLAVES!
Jesus fucking Christ how can the world be this dumb.
February 1, 2026 at 11:13 PM
How can it be that it all just comes down to "they're chasers and if trans people have rights they're harder to sex traffic?"
THEY STARTED A FUCKING GENOCIDE BECAUSE THEY WANTED SEX SLAVES!
Jesus fucking Christ how can the world be this dumb.
THEY STARTED A FUCKING GENOCIDE BECAUSE THEY WANTED SEX SLAVES!
Jesus fucking Christ how can the world be this dumb.
Reposted by Rob Tesh
And yes, it's just profoundly antipathetic to having a democratic political culture to suggest we should just have a political class that manages everything on our behalf
January 31, 2026 at 10:39 PM
And yes, it's just profoundly antipathetic to having a democratic political culture to suggest we should just have a political class that manages everything on our behalf