Robo AD
robosad.blackskycomra.de
Robo AD
@robosad.blackskycomra.de
23, White, AuDHD, Anti-Authoritarian, Largely a Lurker, Aego/Aro, Public Safety Worker, Follower of the Apocalypse
This is my AD account, meaning it interacts with NSFW. Stay away if you are under 18! SFW: https://bsky.app/profile/sgt-robo.bsky.social
Well, at least you acknowledge you're trash i guess.
November 30, 2025 at 9:01 PM
This whole fucking thread is you being intentionally annoying
November 30, 2025 at 8:59 PM
I tell you the issue we have with the list. You keep saying "there is no issue". I explain the issue further, and you say "there is no issue". I tell you how to potentially fix the issue, you say "this is harrasment, there is no issue".
November 30, 2025 at 8:58 PM
This is why I said I don't think you can read. I clearly explained my reasoning and you just responded with the same thing you said before. I'm talking to a brick wall.
November 30, 2025 at 8:54 PM
Well you don't seem yo be good at it
November 30, 2025 at 8:51 PM
I'd recommend the same to you
November 30, 2025 at 8:50 PM
And I've spoken to Rio and we enjoy eachothers posts, this isn't parasocial on our end either, so it seems that you just like to fling accusations
November 30, 2025 at 8:47 PM
I'm not harassing you, im explains the issue people have with your lists, and offering you a means of fixing it.
November 30, 2025 at 8:41 PM
"Baby boy old man" is how I refer to my cat, so I can see it.
November 30, 2025 at 8:41 PM
All you had to do was change a few lines in the list's description, and none of this would have needed to happen. It's all we're asking for, it's been the issue the whole time. It's still the only thing we want. This is being dragged out needlessly because you refuse to acknowledge any mistakes.
November 30, 2025 at 8:40 PM
Because, by putting our friend on that list, you are inherently, whether intentionally or not, smearing them as MAGA and transphobic my way of your lists construction. We are criticizing the construction of your list. And you are claiming it is harrasment.
November 30, 2025 at 8:37 PM
But I put or, and you qualify for the list because you are being annoying, so it should be fine right? Because I'm not calling you a pedophile, you're just on a list that happens to also include them. Or are you seeing the flaw in the logic yet?
November 30, 2025 at 8:34 PM
If MAGA and Anti-LGBT are inherently nuisances and get added to the Nuisance list, having a criterion for them separate from "annoying" is redundant, and serves only to confuse and smear labels on the other people in the list.
November 30, 2025 at 8:34 PM
But I put or, and you qualify for the list because you are being annoying, so it should be fine right? Because I'm not calling you a pedophile, you're just on a list that happens to also include them. Or are you seeing the flaw in the logic yet?
November 30, 2025 at 8:32 PM
But I put or, and you qualify for the list because you are being annoying, so it should be fine right? Because I'm not calling you a pedophile, you're just on a list that happens to also include them. Or are you seeing the flaw in the logic yet?
November 30, 2025 at 8:28 PM
Answer the question
November 30, 2025 at 8:23 PM
If I put you on a list called "annoying or pedophile" would that be ok because I said or?
November 30, 2025 at 8:22 PM
You are though.
November 30, 2025 at 8:21 PM