robert p. baird
banner
robertpbaird.com
robert p. baird
@robertpbaird.com
Thinking is, or ought to be, a coolness and a calmness; and our poor hearts throb, and our poor brains beat too much for that. || I'm on a Bsky hiatus, but THE NIMBUS, my debut novel, is now available in hardcover, ebook, and audiobook. || robertpbaird.com
And yes by “we“ I very much include myself. A healthy society would exile these people to a circus sideshow and let themselves get their kicks where they can’t hurt anyone else. Instead we keep pushing them to the pinnacle of power because we just can’t wait to see what crazy thing they‘ll do next.
November 22, 2025 at 4:26 PM
I guess this is also prime Free Press territory.
November 22, 2025 at 12:03 AM
I bet MY will say it’s smart politics. He likes being a contrarian, even when it’s against his own contrarianism. My money is on Friedersdorf.
November 21, 2025 at 11:56 PM
Credit where it’s due: this is actually worse. bsky.app/profile/corn...
November 21, 2025 at 11:51 PM
It's pure Archie Bunkerism dressed up as legal scholarship. "Why should that guy get something when I didn't do anything to hurt him?"
November 21, 2025 at 7:32 PM
I'm eager what you find! I am the furthest thing from an expert.
November 21, 2025 at 6:24 PM
Exactly: they want to interpret fair use abstractly and universally. I'm outlining my disagreement with them. I understand their logic, but I don't buy it. IMO there's no reason to give up the flexibility the Copyright Act affords.
November 21, 2025 at 6:18 PM
I get that. My point is "it's bad to restrict fair use even for bad applications because it will hurt good applications" is not a compelling argument when the Copyright Act lets us distinguish between types (and intents) of fair use from the jump.
November 21, 2025 at 6:13 PM
One thing about this passage you quoted is that it's already the case in a lot of cases, as people who have worked on Eliot and Joyce et al. can attest. But also (on my layman's reading) the copyright act seems happy to contemplate that fair use might be different for an essay vs. an LLM.
November 21, 2025 at 6:09 PM
I'm also interested! But on the other side of the fence. I'm very much not a lawyer, so could easily run headlong into some well-established bit of caselaw here, but I would emphasize that the fair use provisions of the copyright act aren't intended to be applied abstractly or universally.
November 21, 2025 at 6:05 PM
Same goes for transcription. I do my own for my major interviews, because I want that material rattling around in my head. But sometimes I know, e.g., that I just need a line from a 30-minute conversation, and AI transcription is good enough to help me find it so I can transcribe it myself.
November 19, 2025 at 4:00 PM