From “circumstances to decline acceptance”

comptroller.war.gov/Portals/45/d...

Even the “appearance of integrity” being compromised is reason to decline.

Also, 5.2.5.3., there’s mention of present or prospective business with DoD.

So the donor is anonymous = DoD’s integrity appears compromised

From “circumstances to decline acceptance”

comptroller.war.gov/Portals/45/d...

Even the “appearance of integrity” being compromised is reason to decline.

Also, 5.2.5.3., there’s mention of present or prospective business with DoD.

So the donor is anonymous = DoD’s integrity appears compromised

General public doesn’t know what a “working paper” is.

But they do know you’re smart + appearing to confirm a “free market” argument (w/ research!) against raising the minimum wage.

Made this video 12 years ago. See comments to it. Federal minimum wage still the same. And the wealth gap grows.

Please read Appendix D again before making any summary about causation (“lead to,” as you wrote)?

Does inferring causation from associations mentioned in clearly labeled (i.e., non-peer-reviewed) “working papers” remind you of how misinformation about the coronavirus spread, too? Perhaps “sturgis”?

Indeed, nothing says "I support the 1st Amendment of the U.S. Constitution" (specifically "the right of the people peaceably to assemble") like posting an A.I.-generated video of yourself as king dropping 💩 on protesters.

truthsocial.com/@realDonaldT...
vs.
constitution.congress.gov/constitution...

Aak, no!

I’m “strained”… doing too much… because exercise is such a good stress-reliever…!

Right there with you.

More explanation, please, of the highlighted / circled bit from your September 11 op-ed:

“But I envied what he built.”

Regarding what Kirk built, please consider this perspective, first, perhaps?
www.techdirt.com/2025/09/17/t...