This could suggest that people are using links to find more information rather than check whether AI is accurate - but hard to be sure and probably varies case by case.
This could suggest that people are using links to find more information rather than check whether AI is accurate - but hard to be sure and probably varies case by case.
This is higher than trust in individual chatbots, but mostly because it is more widely used.
Again, younger people have slightly higher trust.
This is higher than trust in individual chatbots, but mostly because it is more widely used.
Again, younger people have slightly higher trust.
As with many behaviours around gen AI, younger people are slightly more likely to say they click through.
As with many behaviours around gen AI, younger people are slightly more likely to say they click through.
It's already true that most people (54%) say that they have seen AI search results in the last week.
It's more common than the use of all chatbots combined (34%).
It's already true that most people (54%) say that they have seen AI search results in the last week.
It's more common than the use of all chatbots combined (34%).
Older people are more likely to use it for the latest news (red bars) but younger people are more likely to use it to help them navigate news (green).
Gen Z (18-24) are particularly likely to use AI to make a news story easier to understand.
Older people are more likely to use it for the latest news (red bars) but younger people are more likely to use it to help them navigate news (green).
Gen Z (18-24) are particularly likely to use AI to make a news story easier to understand.
Though the most widespread use is getting the latest headlines, some are also using it to get more depth, for summarisation, or for making news easier to understand.
Though the most widespread use is getting the latest headlines, some are also using it to get more depth, for summarisation, or for making news easier to understand.
This thread is on how people use gen AI for news, specifically.
Though getting information is emerging as the key use of gen AI, only 6%on average across 🇦🇷🇩🇰🇫🇷🇯🇵🇬🇧🇺🇸 use it for news weekly, doubling since 2024.
This thread is on how people use gen AI for news, specifically.
Though getting information is emerging as the key use of gen AI, only 6%on average across 🇦🇷🇩🇰🇫🇷🇯🇵🇬🇧🇺🇸 use it for news weekly, doubling since 2024.
⬆️ A few systems, like ChatGPT, Gemini and Copilot are more trusted than distrusted.
⬇️ Others, like Meta AI and DeepSeek are more distrusted than trusted.
⬆️ A few systems, like ChatGPT, Gemini and Copilot are more trusted than distrusted.
⬇️ Others, like Meta AI and DeepSeek are more distrusted than trusted.
We've seen a significant shift in the last year, with using AI to get information (e.g. answering factual questions) overtaking using it to create media (e.g. writing emails, making images).
Will this be the main use of gen AI in the future?
We've seen a significant shift in the last year, with using AI to get information (e.g. answering factual questions) overtaking using it to create media (e.g. writing emails, making images).
Will this be the main use of gen AI in the future?
But this only applies to standalone systems like ChatGPT. For AI embedded in other products, like Meta AI and Copilot, there's no age gap because the host product is used by people of all ages.
But this only applies to standalone systems like ChatGPT. For AI embedded in other products, like Meta AI and Copilot, there's no age gap because the host product is used by people of all ages.
Worth remembering that the public's use of a lot of the tools favoured by experts, like Claude and Perplexity, is still very marginal - 1% weekly.
Worth remembering that the public's use of a lot of the tools favoured by experts, like Claude and Perplexity, is still very marginal - 1% weekly.
First, gen AI use has grown rapidly.
Most people have tried out gen AI at least once (61%), and 34% now use it on a weekly basis - roughly doubling from 18% a year ago.
First, gen AI use has grown rapidly.
Most people have tried out gen AI at least once (61%), and 34% now use it on a weekly basis - roughly doubling from 18% a year ago.
In the US those on the right are much less likely to think their views are covered fairly, but this is not a common pattern.
In the US those on the right are much less likely to think their views are covered fairly, but this is not a common pattern.
We outline some interesting demographic differences (more details in 🧵)...
doi.org/10.1177/1464...
We outline some interesting demographic differences (more details in 🧵)...
doi.org/10.1177/1464...
@amyrossarguedas.bsky.social with Digital News Report data on who listens to podcasts, as part of a panel on amplifying communication research through podcasts.
@amyrossarguedas.bsky.social with Digital News Report data on who listens to podcasts, as part of a panel on amplifying communication research through podcasts.
1. @waqasejaz.bsky.social Mary Sandford and me on the link between news use, climate anxiety and pro-environment behaviour across 8 countries.
1. @waqasejaz.bsky.social Mary Sandford and me on the link between news use, climate anxiety and pro-environment behaviour across 8 countries.
1. For the early risers, me @felixsimon.bsky.social @waqasejaz.bsky.social & @rasmuskleis.bsky.social on what variables are associated with positive/negative attitudes towards the use of generative AI in news in 🇬🇧🇺🇸🇩🇰🇦🇷🇯🇵🇫🇷
1. For the early risers, me @felixsimon.bsky.social @waqasejaz.bsky.social & @rasmuskleis.bsky.social on what variables are associated with positive/negative attitudes towards the use of generative AI in news in 🇬🇧🇺🇸🇩🇰🇦🇷🇯🇵🇫🇷