R.E.D. - Looking for Work
@redyoshicraft.bsky.social
Thank you!
I'm trying, and I hope so as well!
I'm trying, and I hope so as well!
December 9, 2025 at 4:09 PM
Thank you!
I'm trying, and I hope so as well!
I'm trying, and I hope so as well!
I'll stick with it and keep exploring what it has to offer, but if I find a good excuse to start over I just might. 😅
December 3, 2025 at 4:10 AM
I'll stick with it and keep exploring what it has to offer, but if I find a good excuse to start over I just might. 😅
It, communicates.. the year? Is, is that not clear?
It communicates the year, and what release of that year it is.
Not important to everyone, but it's useful information.
It communicates the year, and what release of that year it is.
Not important to everyone, but it's useful information.
December 2, 2025 at 7:42 PM
It, communicates.. the year? Is, is that not clear?
It communicates the year, and what release of that year it is.
Not important to everyone, but it's useful information.
It communicates the year, and what release of that year it is.
Not important to everyone, but it's useful information.
A problem with the previous system is it was kinda arbitrary.
It increased based on what was considered a "major" release, but that caused expectation and disappointment if it wasn't met.
1.15 for example, fantastic update for what it is, but looked down upon as a major release due to it's scale.
It increased based on what was considered a "major" release, but that caused expectation and disappointment if it wasn't met.
1.15 for example, fantastic update for what it is, but looked down upon as a major release due to it's scale.
December 2, 2025 at 7:25 PM
A problem with the previous system is it was kinda arbitrary.
It increased based on what was considered a "major" release, but that caused expectation and disappointment if it wasn't met.
1.15 for example, fantastic update for what it is, but looked down upon as a major release due to it's scale.
It increased based on what was considered a "major" release, but that caused expectation and disappointment if it wasn't met.
1.15 for example, fantastic update for what it is, but looked down upon as a major release due to it's scale.
Even if we were still on annual updates, potentially even if the updates were every OTHER year, I think this would still be a nice change.
It gives additional information without spelling it out, changing the release reliably & consistently based on context.
It gives additional information without spelling it out, changing the release reliably & consistently based on context.
December 2, 2025 at 7:25 PM
Even if we were still on annual updates, potentially even if the updates were every OTHER year, I think this would still be a nice change.
It gives additional information without spelling it out, changing the release reliably & consistently based on context.
It gives additional information without spelling it out, changing the release reliably & consistently based on context.
Exactly!
A digit that never changes in a versioning system that's meant to represent CHANGE, is entirely useless and has no point being there.
A digit that never changes in a versioning system that's meant to represent CHANGE, is entirely useless and has no point being there.
December 2, 2025 at 7:11 PM
Exactly!
A digit that never changes in a versioning system that's meant to represent CHANGE, is entirely useless and has no point being there.
A digit that never changes in a versioning system that's meant to represent CHANGE, is entirely useless and has no point being there.
I would be more concerned about 2101 xD
But when that time comes, they'll probably just say 101.x, and theoretically 3001.x, or something of that nature.
But when that time comes, they'll probably just say 101.x, and theoretically 3001.x, or something of that nature.
December 2, 2025 at 5:51 PM
I would be more concerned about 2101 xD
But when that time comes, they'll probably just say 101.x, and theoretically 3001.x, or something of that nature.
But when that time comes, they'll probably just say 101.x, and theoretically 3001.x, or something of that nature.
They've said there would never be a "2.0" Release, which stands true.
At one point that may have been a consideration, but since it no longer is, the 1.x versioning is just a wasted digit, so I think it's a very good call to do away with it.
At one point that may have been a consideration, but since it no longer is, the 1.x versioning is just a wasted digit, so I think it's a very good call to do away with it.
December 2, 2025 at 5:46 PM
They've said there would never be a "2.0" Release, which stands true.
At one point that may have been a consideration, but since it no longer is, the 1.x versioning is just a wasted digit, so I think it's a very good call to do away with it.
At one point that may have been a consideration, but since it no longer is, the 1.x versioning is just a wasted digit, so I think it's a very good call to do away with it.