Person who works for The Economist not being able to read, name a more iconic duo.

IngSoc anti-sex league alive and well

Sick of trans "icons" who go mainstream and the moment they do treat their transness like a curse & treat their fanbase w/barely disguised contempt, pushing all their chips into the "passablity" fallacy and aspiring to be a basic centrist bitch

The people making decisions btw whether it's siding with "GCs" in court cases or in drafting "GC"-friendly govt policy are fully aware of the true nature of this movement: that it is extremely dehumanising and eliminationist. It's not some secret only trans people know about. "Decision makers" know.

This policy, to the extent that cisgender queer kids end up in gender identity services (and I don't think it should, kids who are just a bit gender bent but don't want to transition should be left unmedicalised!) ends up framing queer childhood gender differences through a transmedicalist lens.

Can't believe we got a high-concept sci-fi thriller show with an NB/NB love story at its core.

But also the modern trend of a 'wellness' that would rather see people die of 'natural causes' than live with biotechnological interventions meant to prolong and improve our lives cannot tell the difference between body fascism and bodily autonomy.

The most nonsensical thing about this is that the Christofascist, Nationalist projects being decried oppose transition access and universal healthcare. Calling HRT or surgery a part of a eugenical system when the system tries to gatekeep and deny it to trans people is exactly backwards.

So we need at the very least to convince large numbers of people not in the immortal science of Marxism-Leninism or Anarchist Communism but, but first of all this:

That the things that are bad do not have to be bad and all of us have a small part to play in changing them. That solidarity works.