Action flick with a female lead, you say?

La Femme Nikita! I know - it's 1990 not 2000s. But it is SOOOOO GREAT!

And doesn't it seem like a major motivation for both is, basically, laziness? The GOP: "citing and arguing legal justifications for things" and "formulating complex legislation and getting it through Congress" is too hard! Dems: "holding criminals to account is super hard and people call us names!"

Is anyone else curious about why all the photos and the very awkwardly staged Q&A are screening Trump's lower half from the cameras? I mean, he usually does these post-meeting pressers in the chairs on the other side of the Oval.

Yeah, that's it. The reason air travel sucks now is because I'm not wearing stockings, a girdle and gloves, and my husband isn't wearing a suit and a homburg. It has nothing to do with the delays, overbooking, lack of legroom, nickel and diming on food and luggage, and general enshitification.

They will all be jamming forever at the cosmic Big Pink.

Sports bras are a menace! I almost dislocated my shoulder trying to extricate myself from one once. You're lucky a hand was still free enough to text for HELP!

We're gonna need a bigger suitcase.

This sentiment hasn't emerged in a vacuum. The never-ending vilification of urban spaces and lifestyle means people with no experience of it are primed to see it negatively. So the 'preference' is actually a prejudice, explaining the gap between 39-47% wanting urban dev but less funding for it.

Gessen states it well but, as you know, this critique has been expressed for quite a while, in academia and beyond. And it's ironic, right? Because Holocaust Studies and Genocide Studies scholarship is inter-dependent and Holocaust exceptionalism weakens the fabric of both.