Pranay⚡️
@pranman.com
I build tech for good. I also talk a lot about stuff that makes you think.
The British Empire stoked communal violence, left India in turmoil, and drew borders that caused millions to migrate and become refugees - including my grandparents.
Credit for uniting India goes to the nation's independence movement, its founders and especially Sardar Patel.
Credit for uniting India goes to the nation's independence movement, its founders and especially Sardar Patel.
Political integration of India - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
November 12, 2025 at 7:15 PM
The British Empire stoked communal violence, left India in turmoil, and drew borders that caused millions to migrate and become refugees - including my grandparents.
Credit for uniting India goes to the nation's independence movement, its founders and especially Sardar Patel.
Credit for uniting India goes to the nation's independence movement, its founders and especially Sardar Patel.
I'm more excited talking to it about dental issues and sports injuries, but I've shared with those who might be open to talking to you about mental health chats they've had!
October 29, 2025 at 4:42 PM
I'm more excited talking to it about dental issues and sports injuries, but I've shared with those who might be open to talking to you about mental health chats they've had!
Isn't this literally everyone in the world? 😀
October 29, 2025 at 4:36 PM
Isn't this literally everyone in the world? 😀
The Left is fundamentally different: when we find people who don't know, we say "here are 5 books and 3 articles on the subject".
October 25, 2025 at 5:55 AM
The Left is fundamentally different: when we find people who don't know, we say "here are 5 books and 3 articles on the subject".
This is like someone eating a chicken tikka and thinking they've landed the Indian vote
October 17, 2025 at 10:14 AM
This is like someone eating a chicken tikka and thinking they've landed the Indian vote
Then you don't understand power.
If the monarch had to use his prerogative to block a bill from becoming law after it had passed parliament, that would be considered a complete failure on his part. The point is that you influence it earlier in the journey.
If the monarch had to use his prerogative to block a bill from becoming law after it had passed parliament, that would be considered a complete failure on his part. The point is that you influence it earlier in the journey.
October 17, 2025 at 9:15 AM
Then you don't understand power.
If the monarch had to use his prerogative to block a bill from becoming law after it had passed parliament, that would be considered a complete failure on his part. The point is that you influence it earlier in the journey.
If the monarch had to use his prerogative to block a bill from becoming law after it had passed parliament, that would be considered a complete failure on his part. The point is that you influence it earlier in the journey.
It is interference. The Monarch gets a look in before parliament.
One of the reasons British Museum cannot even loan, much less return, stolen art is because a law passed by Queen's Consent prevents it.
One of the reasons British Museum cannot even loan, much less return, stolen art is because a law passed by Queen's Consent prevents it.
Royals vetted more than 1,000 laws via Queen’s consent
Exclusive: secretive procedure used to review laws ranging from Brexit trade deal to inheritance and land policy
www.theguardian.com
October 16, 2025 at 10:27 PM
It is interference. The Monarch gets a look in before parliament.
One of the reasons British Museum cannot even loan, much less return, stolen art is because a law passed by Queen's Consent prevents it.
One of the reasons British Museum cannot even loan, much less return, stolen art is because a law passed by Queen's Consent prevents it.
I'm with you. Charles is not just a public face though, as head of state of the biggest tax havens in the world, he's an active facilitator of wealth networks. The monarchy is one of the reasons Britain can never get a wealth tax.
October 16, 2025 at 10:20 PM
I'm with you. Charles is not just a public face though, as head of state of the biggest tax havens in the world, he's an active facilitator of wealth networks. The monarchy is one of the reasons Britain can never get a wealth tax.
Not sure why you can't reply.
The link you've shared explains the RP academically and innocuously. If it seems fine to you consider that the person with this level of authority over your country will pass it on to his son, who will pass it on to his, and so on.
The link you've shared explains the RP academically and innocuously. If it seems fine to you consider that the person with this level of authority over your country will pass it on to his son, who will pass it on to his, and so on.
October 16, 2025 at 10:14 PM
Not sure why you can't reply.
The link you've shared explains the RP academically and innocuously. If it seems fine to you consider that the person with this level of authority over your country will pass it on to his son, who will pass it on to his, and so on.
The link you've shared explains the RP academically and innocuously. If it seems fine to you consider that the person with this level of authority over your country will pass it on to his son, who will pass it on to his, and so on.
Reposted by Pranay⚡️
Yes, America should aspire to get rid of tyranny but create a dynasty of Trump descendents who receive untold wealth from the public for the difficult task of waving from balconies and seeming gracious while believing they have better blood than their subjects.
Hard pass. No kings, thx.
Hard pass. No kings, thx.
October 16, 2025 at 8:00 PM
Yes, America should aspire to get rid of tyranny but create a dynasty of Trump descendents who receive untold wealth from the public for the difficult task of waving from balconies and seeming gracious while believing they have better blood than their subjects.
Hard pass. No kings, thx.
Hard pass. No kings, thx.
The point of ‘no kings’ is consistent limits on power.
If you think the British monarchy is irrelevant or non-existent, I'd encourage you to read about the King's Consent, the Royal Prerogative, look at the biggest tax havens in the world and see which ones are his realms.
If you think the British monarchy is irrelevant or non-existent, I'd encourage you to read about the King's Consent, the Royal Prerogative, look at the biggest tax havens in the world and see which ones are his realms.
October 16, 2025 at 9:28 PM
The point of ‘no kings’ is consistent limits on power.
If you think the British monarchy is irrelevant or non-existent, I'd encourage you to read about the King's Consent, the Royal Prerogative, look at the biggest tax havens in the world and see which ones are his realms.
If you think the British monarchy is irrelevant or non-existent, I'd encourage you to read about the King's Consent, the Royal Prerogative, look at the biggest tax havens in the world and see which ones are his realms.
Reposted by Pranay⚡️
As a committed anti-monarchist, I've been trying to highlight the irony for people in Britain (and Canada and elsewhere) supporting the No Kings movement.
To no avail.
To no avail.
October 16, 2025 at 7:34 PM
As a committed anti-monarchist, I've been trying to highlight the irony for people in Britain (and Canada and elsewhere) supporting the No Kings movement.
To no avail.
To no avail.