Lantze Vongkorad
picor5.bsky.social
Lantze Vongkorad
@picor5.bsky.social
lantzev.net

14, math, philosophy
*using forcing
July 24, 2025 at 4:24 PM
"met" means meeting all dense sets of the partial order. Adjoin G to V to form V[G]. In V[G], said functions can be used to show that $2^{\aleph_0} = \aleph_2$, showing that there is a model of ZFC in which CH holds. But CH is also false under another ZFC model, therefore CH is independent from ZFC.
June 25, 2025 at 9:02 AM
Therefore, in order to make these functions "full", a filter must be created to "meet" every single function. Said filter is comprised of said $\aleph_2$ functions. Let G be a (generic) subset of a filter of such $\aleph_2$ functions. The functions are then all "met".
June 25, 2025 at 8:47 AM
We start with a base model M of ZFC. In this case, we select V. Construct a poset P of functions regarding the model V. P is comprised of $\aleph_2$ functions from an arbitrary set S to 2. However, these functions are partial.
June 25, 2025 at 8:42 AM
Reposted by Lantze Vongkorad
What color do you think weakly compact cardinals are? I associate each of the compact cardinals with shades of blue, with weakly compacts being the lightest.
June 21, 2025 at 5:46 AM
Reposted by Lantze Vongkorad
supposedly “oPeN-mINdEd” people whenever someone opposite to their views is open-minded:
June 24, 2025 at 8:02 AM
Good. Bluesky’s UI is better than Twitter’s.
June 24, 2025 at 8:03 AM
supposedly “oPeN-mINdEd” people whenever someone opposite to their views is open-minded:
June 24, 2025 at 8:02 AM
Wish this was implemented in my area (shitty-ass suburban town in Florida)
June 21, 2025 at 6:02 AM
What color do you think weakly compact cardinals are? I associate each of the compact cardinals with shades of blue, with weakly compacts being the lightest.
June 21, 2025 at 5:46 AM
Reposted by Lantze Vongkorad
This is why I (amateur mathematician), am not scared to be "replaced" by AI.
April 14, 2025 at 3:11 AM
This is why I (amateur mathematician), am not scared to be "replaced" by AI.
April 14, 2025 at 3:11 AM
In fact, the notion of a "metaphysical shadow (of something) is a social contruct.
March 29, 2025 at 8:44 PM
Only the representation changes: Also, the notion of even 'notation' is highly social; 'Tsakön' likely currently doesn't mean anything in any language, but if 'Tsakön' does, then 'Tsakön' will be a mere metaphysical shadow of whatever it represents.
March 29, 2025 at 8:44 PM
Text: It is idiotic to assume that the metaphysical concept of a number is equivalent to its corresponding numeral. '4' and 'IV' mean the exact same. As an analogy, take the Russian word 'сердце' (heart). Both the Latin form 'Serdtze' and 'сердцe' mean the same in Russian.
March 29, 2025 at 8:42 PM