Well, you've not shown that you have the capacity to understand what you reply to, and often times you directly undermine your own case with your replies. As such, you opinion doesn't warrant any weight in the matter. You can continue to reply, but you'll be muted as you have nothing to offer. Bye

I don't need luck; I'm the one between the two of us who can read.

You need to re-read what Hurb said.
That's kind of a theme with you; you misread something and then you respond as if someone said something that they didn't. In this case Hurb was being hyperbolic, positing that, based solely on your comments, you might need those reminders.

Well... there we go: Sled Dead Redemption. I can do that.

I guess since Abbi summoned me, I'm in.
Abbi, what will I be doing?

Who did you vote for? And, why do you incorrectly think that is relevant to the issue of people refusing to hold elected officials accountable for their actions?
All you're doing is proving the point of the person you're responding to.

'extremely unsurprising'
Dear, dear Fiona: you continue to be able to cut through me and read me to filth with a startling economy of words.

Shakes, since you've brought this to my attention, I regret to inform you that "Ah, what da hell. Fried chicken." is going now going to be a song title for an upcoming band.

I never had to use or see it before they fired me, but Grammarly was integrated into their email and CRM, and based on reports from a friend still working there the responses are auto-generated for review based on the incoming email, but are usually deleted and rewritten entirely.

I used to be work as a trainer for a company whose main need was in business communications training, but was then let go when the company went all-in on Grammarly.
Now, they have both software AND service reps who can't write business emails.