Pavel AI
@pavelai.bsky.social
It's only the beginning. Soon it would be time to switch the industry
December 17, 2025 at 8:30 AM
It's only the beginning. Soon it would be time to switch the industry
But it was a different move by Redis. They are trying to fight this nonsense when cloud-providers sell others products and put money in own pockets
December 14, 2025 at 4:19 PM
But it was a different move by Redis. They are trying to fight this nonsense when cloud-providers sell others products and put money in own pockets
Open-source enshiftification? I think anyone can fork pre-AGPL licensed code and start their own development under different name. License change could not affect the code written under different license (what was that?) and would cover only future changes
December 14, 2025 at 3:37 PM
Open-source enshiftification? I think anyone can fork pre-AGPL licensed code and start their own development under different name. License change could not affect the code written under different license (what was that?) and would cover only future changes
Making it linear instead of spiral is the best solution! It's more natural to read from start to end, than by using mental goto map. It's sad that Golang didn't scale this to the whole language and bring another kind of mental acrobatics
December 14, 2025 at 11:44 AM
Making it linear instead of spiral is the best solution! It's more natural to read from start to end, than by using mental goto map. It's sad that Golang didn't scale this to the whole language and bring another kind of mental acrobatics
Tauri has a very smooth learning curve. And I've been abled to run a hello world project in 15 minutes (on MacOS), without any hustle. And the bundle size made me very happy
December 13, 2025 at 2:41 PM
Tauri has a very smooth learning curve. And I've been abled to run a hello world project in 15 minutes (on MacOS), without any hustle. And the bundle size made me very happy
Didn't know about that thing. So this runner allows models to access GPU? And those micro models are they of Phi4 family?
December 12, 2025 at 9:20 PM
Didn't know about that thing. So this runner allows models to access GPU? And those micro models are they of Phi4 family?
Do you run them with Ollama. Or is it an independent runtime?
December 12, 2025 at 8:52 PM
Do you run them with Ollama. Or is it an independent runtime?
This year is reach for CSS feature release. And I've got lost after all these long-wanted features of anchors, scroll animations, css functions, etc got landed in browsers. Do we still need JS for UI? 😅
December 12, 2025 at 6:19 PM
This year is reach for CSS feature release. And I've got lost after all these long-wanted features of anchors, scroll animations, css functions, etc got landed in browsers. Do we still need JS for UI? 😅
I understand why attr() couldn't be recommended. It would have high performance costs. But why not on-demand classes?
December 10, 2025 at 5:46 AM
I understand why attr() couldn't be recommended. It would have high performance costs. But why not on-demand classes?
It's kinda an unexpected advice from someone from Google team. Why so?
December 10, 2025 at 5:42 AM
It's kinda an unexpected advice from someone from Google team. Why so?
Doing on-demand classes or doing them with `attr()`?
December 9, 2025 at 5:49 PM
Doing on-demand classes or doing them with `attr()`?
Awesome to see function in the list. Are there on-demand classes in the development? Like UnoCSS has to generate rules on the fly without the need to ship all the rules with CSS-file. And just specify a universal rule to generate infinite number of styles, like .margin-$N { margin: param($N, "px") }
December 9, 2025 at 11:54 AM
Awesome to see function in the list. Are there on-demand classes in the development? Like UnoCSS has to generate rules on the fly without the need to ship all the rules with CSS-file. And just specify a universal rule to generate infinite number of styles, like .margin-$N { margin: param($N, "px") }
Thanks, Ahmad! I appreciate it!
December 4, 2025 at 5:37 AM
Thanks, Ahmad! I appreciate it!
I think we can agree on the first and third. What's about the second I believe security should be simple. And I can agree that Deno *allows to create local sandboxing*, but it requires too much of efforts to achieve it. But I should write some code to show what I meant
Have a good day
Have a good day
December 3, 2025 at 9:43 AM
I think we can agree on the first and third. What's about the second I believe security should be simple. And I can agree that Deno *allows to create local sandboxing*, but it requires too much of efforts to achieve it. But I should write some code to show what I meant
Have a good day
Have a good day
Their model is too rigid and Deno stood halfway to become a solution for reliable sandboxes. This is why they had implemented permission broker (the change came from their own cloud solution). But Deno still has a long way to be able to work in safe mode 100% of time
December 3, 2025 at 8:36 AM
Their model is too rigid and Deno stood halfway to become a solution for reliable sandboxes. This is why they had implemented permission broker (the change came from their own cloud solution). But Deno still has a long way to be able to work in safe mode 100% of time
The article you provided is written by cloud provider. And I was talking from developers side. I has a lot of experience of using Deno and you can not use some of their own products with all protections turned on
December 3, 2025 at 8:36 AM
The article you provided is written by cloud provider. And I was talking from developers side. I has a lot of experience of using Deno and you can not use some of their own products with all protections turned on
Good point, but if "It was required to turn the sandbox to make things work". I think it is the synonym to "Sandbox doesn't work". If it's not possible to run an app without relaxing protection, then there is no protection. It doesn't matter how strict guaranties if they isn't in use 100% of time
December 3, 2025 at 8:36 AM
Good point, but if "It was required to turn the sandbox to make things work". I think it is the synonym to "Sandbox doesn't work". If it's not possible to run an app without relaxing protection, then there is no protection. It doesn't matter how strict guaranties if they isn't in use 100% of time
It works, but it doesn't cover all the use cases and there are many cases when it requires full access to the OS. So it practically useless. Even the creators of the tool don't use sandboxes and teach developers to run code from the web with all checks turned off
December 3, 2025 at 8:00 AM
It works, but it doesn't cover all the use cases and there are many cases when it requires full access to the OS. So it practically useless. Even the creators of the tool don't use sandboxes and teach developers to run code from the web with all checks turned off
Their sandboxing model is good only for cloud providers and doesn't work on local environments. Even Deno itself is using -A flag in their documentation. I like Deno but it requires more research and engineering to solve local sandboxing
December 3, 2025 at 7:31 AM
Their sandboxing model is good only for cloud providers and doesn't work on local environments. Even Deno itself is using -A flag in their documentation. I like Deno but it requires more research and engineering to solve local sandboxing