Reposted
Reposted
Are Americans fatally stupid enough to believe this nonsense?
I suppose we’ll find out.
I suppose we’ll find out.
November 11, 2025 at 2:12 AM
Are Americans fatally stupid enough to believe this nonsense?
I suppose we’ll find out.
I suppose we’ll find out.
Reposted
Ask him if he can point out anywhere in the history of economics where an individual customer has any leverage to negotiate prices with a multi billion dollar corporation.
November 11, 2025 at 2:25 AM
Ask him if he can point out anywhere in the history of economics where an individual customer has any leverage to negotiate prices with a multi billion dollar corporation.
Us southern girls say it this way
November 11, 2025 at 4:04 AM
Us southern girls say it this way
Reposted
Reposted
For what?
Extending SNAP? The courts were already pushing for it.
Rehiring federal workers? Congress cannot force Trump to do it. He’ll fight it all the way.
A “promise” to vote on ACA subsidies? Republicans are under less pressure now than they were last week to keep the subsidies alive.
3/6
Extending SNAP? The courts were already pushing for it.
Rehiring federal workers? Congress cannot force Trump to do it. He’ll fight it all the way.
A “promise” to vote on ACA subsidies? Republicans are under less pressure now than they were last week to keep the subsidies alive.
3/6
November 10, 2025 at 9:01 PM
For what?
Extending SNAP? The courts were already pushing for it.
Rehiring federal workers? Congress cannot force Trump to do it. He’ll fight it all the way.
A “promise” to vote on ACA subsidies? Republicans are under less pressure now than they were last week to keep the subsidies alive.
3/6
Extending SNAP? The courts were already pushing for it.
Rehiring federal workers? Congress cannot force Trump to do it. He’ll fight it all the way.
A “promise” to vote on ACA subsidies? Republicans are under less pressure now than they were last week to keep the subsidies alive.
3/6
Reposted
They watched Trump fight the courts to withhold SNAP.
His reckless cruelty was becoming apparent to members of his own cult.
So what did Democrats do with this newfound momentum?
Yesterday, they doused it in gasoline and lit it on fire.
2/6
His reckless cruelty was becoming apparent to members of his own cult.
So what did Democrats do with this newfound momentum?
Yesterday, they doused it in gasoline and lit it on fire.
2/6
November 10, 2025 at 9:01 PM
They watched Trump fight the courts to withhold SNAP.
His reckless cruelty was becoming apparent to members of his own cult.
So what did Democrats do with this newfound momentum?
Yesterday, they doused it in gasoline and lit it on fire.
2/6
His reckless cruelty was becoming apparent to members of his own cult.
So what did Democrats do with this newfound momentum?
Yesterday, they doused it in gasoline and lit it on fire.
2/6
Reposted
I called or at least attempted to call the eight Senators this morning and voicemails are full. That includes local offices as well. Keep calling and keep the pressure on
November 10, 2025 at 3:56 PM
I called or at least attempted to call the eight Senators this morning and voicemails are full. That includes local offices as well. Keep calling and keep the pressure on
Reposted
Meanwhile, what else is the Orange Chaos Mobster bulldozing?
Goddard?
Goddard?
November 10, 2025 at 3:56 PM
Meanwhile, what else is the Orange Chaos Mobster bulldozing?
Goddard?
Goddard?
Reposted
(3/3)
And then Convicted Felon Donald Trump has to sign it for it to become law.
We are far from being done, folks.
And then Convicted Felon Donald Trump has to sign it for it to become law.
We are far from being done, folks.
November 10, 2025 at 3:54 PM
(3/3)
And then Convicted Felon Donald Trump has to sign it for it to become law.
We are far from being done, folks.
And then Convicted Felon Donald Trump has to sign it for it to become law.
We are far from being done, folks.
Reposted
If a leader cannot unify his own caucus, why is he still a leader?
November 10, 2025 at 6:47 PM
If a leader cannot unify his own caucus, why is he still a leader?
Reposted
Reposted
Schumer set this up. He didn't try to convince people to follow him. He hand picked Senators who weren't seeking reelection.
You have traitors on both sides. Nazis, and Vichy.
You have traitors on both sides. Nazis, and Vichy.
November 10, 2025 at 4:52 AM
Schumer set this up. He didn't try to convince people to follow him. He hand picked Senators who weren't seeking reelection.
You have traitors on both sides. Nazis, and Vichy.
You have traitors on both sides. Nazis, and Vichy.