Narasimhan Rajaram
@nrajaram.bsky.social
Reposted by Narasimhan Rajaram
Reposted by Narasimhan Rajaram
Very excited to announce that our department is now accepting applications for a tenure track faculty position in Cell Biology: uasys.wd5.myworkdayjobs.com/en-US/UASYS/...
Come join our wonderful department!
Come join our wonderful department!
Assistant Professor Cell Biology
Current University of Arkansas System employees, including student employees and graduate assistants, need to log in to Workday via MyApps.Microsoft.com, then access Find Jobs from the Workday search ...
uasys.wd5.myworkdayjobs.com
September 26, 2025 at 2:20 PM
Very excited to announce that our department is now accepting applications for a tenure track faculty position in Cell Biology: uasys.wd5.myworkdayjobs.com/en-US/UASYS/...
Come join our wonderful department!
Come join our wonderful department!
Reposted by Narasimhan Rajaram
For folks reading, the best luck I've had in getting a good study section assignment is to work on my abstract. Use the SS finder tool and make sure to include key words that are priorities for the SS you're targeting, keep tweaking until it comes out top. Im convinced this is their process anyway
August 22, 2025 at 1:27 PM
For folks reading, the best luck I've had in getting a good study section assignment is to work on my abstract. Use the SS finder tool and make sure to include key words that are priorities for the SS you're targeting, keep tweaking until it comes out top. Im convinced this is their process anyway
Reposted by Narasimhan Rajaram
👆Cuts always hurt those with less reputational advantages more. If NIH wants to increase funding to IDeA states, the easiest way is to increase the overall NIH budget and the amount dedicated to IDeA co-funding, so that strong applications that just miss paylines get picked up.
July 12, 2025 at 5:06 PM
👆Cuts always hurt those with less reputational advantages more. If NIH wants to increase funding to IDeA states, the easiest way is to increase the overall NIH budget and the amount dedicated to IDeA co-funding, so that strong applications that just miss paylines get picked up.
Reposted by Narasimhan Rajaram
For ESIs dealing with grants being rescinded: if an investigator’s 1st substantial independent research award is terminated within the first 3 years of the project period (not due to scientific misconduct ) they can request the reinstatement of ESI status
grants.nih.gov/news-events/...
grants.nih.gov/news-events/...
July 2, 2025 at 7:27 PM
For ESIs dealing with grants being rescinded: if an investigator’s 1st substantial independent research award is terminated within the first 3 years of the project period (not due to scientific misconduct ) they can request the reinstatement of ESI status
grants.nih.gov/news-events/...
grants.nih.gov/news-events/...
Automatic extension of ESI status for investigators impacted by NIH delays..
grants.nih.gov/grants/guide...
grants.nih.gov/grants/guide...
NOT-OD-25-114: Notice of Short-Term Extension to Early-Stage Investigator (ESI) Eligibility Period
NIH Funding Opportunities and Notices in the NIH Guide for Grants and Contracts: Notice of Short-Term Extension to Early-Stage Investigator (ESI) Eligibility Period NOT-OD-25-114. OD
grants.nih.gov
May 20, 2025 at 5:53 PM
Automatic extension of ESI status for investigators impacted by NIH delays..
grants.nih.gov/grants/guide...
grants.nih.gov/grants/guide...
Reposted by Narasimhan Rajaram
This IS grant shaming and I think it is an error. NIH grant award is not just hard, it is also biased in various ways. A lack of success could be due to the circular logic of review by the previously successful. Epidemiology and health economics could very well deserve more funding than they receive
We're not trying to grant-shame here. NIH grants are HARD to get. We get it. They are very competitive.
But what this all means is Bhattacharya is a health economist not a medical researcher, and someone who didn't really, couldn't really, get NIH grants on his own.
But what this all means is Bhattacharya is a health economist not a medical researcher, and someone who didn't really, couldn't really, get NIH grants on his own.
March 6, 2025 at 2:22 AM
This IS grant shaming and I think it is an error. NIH grant award is not just hard, it is also biased in various ways. A lack of success could be due to the circular logic of review by the previously successful. Epidemiology and health economics could very well deserve more funding than they receive