@not--normal.bsky.social
Stay informed. Verify everything you read. Be kind.
🧵thoughts on the mtg's House seat
(I don't endorse, I just care about winning. napkin math)
(I don't endorse, I just care about winning. napkin math)
January 21, 2026 at 7:25 PM
🧵thoughts on the mtg's House seat
(I don't endorse, I just care about winning. napkin math)
(I don't endorse, I just care about winning. napkin math)
Reposted
Just to be clear, Republicans in the Oversight Committee just voted NO on a motion to hold Pam Bondi and the DOJ in contempt of Congress for violating the Epstein Files Transparency Act.
January 21, 2026 at 6:20 PM
Just to be clear, Republicans in the Oversight Committee just voted NO on a motion to hold Pam Bondi and the DOJ in contempt of Congress for violating the Epstein Files Transparency Act.
🧵 Epstein case special master motion update
January 21, 2026 at 6:29 PM
🧵 Epstein case special master motion update
🧵 my breakdown of Carney's speech
A bit late to the party, but better late than never.
A bit late to the party, but better late than never.
January 21, 2026 at 1:23 PM
🧵 my breakdown of Carney's speech
A bit late to the party, but better late than never.
A bit late to the party, but better late than never.
🧵Trump 2 - year 1
This admin practices a strategy they call "flooding the zone." The make it intentionally hard to keep track of what they do.
We're coming up on 365 days of this admin. I am sharing some notes about this year.
This admin practices a strategy they call "flooding the zone." The make it intentionally hard to keep track of what they do.
We're coming up on 365 days of this admin. I am sharing some notes about this year.
January 20, 2026 at 3:04 PM
🧵Trump 2 - year 1
This admin practices a strategy they call "flooding the zone." The make it intentionally hard to keep track of what they do.
We're coming up on 365 days of this admin. I am sharing some notes about this year.
This admin practices a strategy they call "flooding the zone." The make it intentionally hard to keep track of what they do.
We're coming up on 365 days of this admin. I am sharing some notes about this year.
🧵 Update on Minnesota vs DHS
The DOJ files a response to the TRO request
Note that this is different from the TRO that was granted a few days ago (different case)
This case is about the legality of the entire operation
CASE 0:26-cv-00190-KMM-DJF Doc. 33
The DOJ files a response to the TRO request
Note that this is different from the TRO that was granted a few days ago (different case)
This case is about the legality of the entire operation
CASE 0:26-cv-00190-KMM-DJF Doc. 33
January 20, 2026 at 11:20 AM
🧵 Update on Minnesota vs DHS
The DOJ files a response to the TRO request
Note that this is different from the TRO that was granted a few days ago (different case)
This case is about the legality of the entire operation
CASE 0:26-cv-00190-KMM-DJF Doc. 33
The DOJ files a response to the TRO request
Note that this is different from the TRO that was granted a few days ago (different case)
This case is about the legality of the entire operation
CASE 0:26-cv-00190-KMM-DJF Doc. 33
I see a lot of headlines about Minnesota but the big question is not answered.
🧵Why Minnesota?
🧵Why Minnesota?
January 19, 2026 at 12:12 PM
I see a lot of headlines about Minnesota but the big question is not answered.
🧵Why Minnesota?
🧵Why Minnesota?
🧵Minnesota going into Jan 19th
January 19, 2026 at 10:21 AM
🧵Minnesota going into Jan 19th
I want you to understand the level of gaslighting here. The Department of Justice is not just arguing that they don't have to release the Epstein files.
They are arguing that the Congressmen who wrote the law have no legal right to ask if it's being followed.
follow up 🧵
They are arguing that the Congressmen who wrote the law have no legal right to ask if it's being followed.
follow up 🧵
The Department of Justice has formally moved to block the enforcement of the Epstein Files Transparency Act
because of course they did...
a 🧵
because of course they did...
a 🧵
January 17, 2026 at 5:12 AM
I want you to understand the level of gaslighting here. The Department of Justice is not just arguing that they don't have to release the Epstein files.
They are arguing that the Congressmen who wrote the law have no legal right to ask if it's being followed.
follow up 🧵
They are arguing that the Congressmen who wrote the law have no legal right to ask if it's being followed.
follow up 🧵
The Department of Justice has formally moved to block the enforcement of the Epstein Files Transparency Act
because of course they did...
a 🧵
because of course they did...
a 🧵
January 17, 2026 at 4:40 AM
The Department of Justice has formally moved to block the enforcement of the Epstein Files Transparency Act
because of course they did...
a 🧵
because of course they did...
a 🧵
Minnesota TRO 🧵
January 17, 2026 at 2:17 AM
Minnesota TRO 🧵
You do not threaten martial law in an online shitpost or charge a Governor with sedition for taking notes if you are winning.
This is the panic of a flailing administration terrified of judicial review. Deeply unserious people are breaking the Republic because they are too incompetent to govern it
This is the panic of a flailing administration terrified of judicial review. Deeply unserious people are breaking the Republic because they are too incompetent to govern it
January 17, 2026 at 1:04 AM
You do not threaten martial law in an online shitpost or charge a Governor with sedition for taking notes if you are winning.
This is the panic of a flailing administration terrified of judicial review. Deeply unserious people are breaking the Republic because they are too incompetent to govern it
This is the panic of a flailing administration terrified of judicial review. Deeply unserious people are breaking the Republic because they are too incompetent to govern it
The criminal investigation into Minnesota Governor Tim Walz 🧵
January 17, 2026 at 12:29 AM
The criminal investigation into Minnesota Governor Tim Walz 🧵
1/ It is Saturday, Jan 17. We are 48 hours from a defining constitutional deadline. Following the President's Jan 15 threat to invoke the Insurrection Act via social media, the legal ground in Minnesota v. DHS (Case No. 0:26-cv-00190) has shifted from a dispute over policy to a crisis of federalism.
January 16, 2026 at 11:43 PM
1/ It is Saturday, Jan 17. We are 48 hours from a defining constitutional deadline. Following the President's Jan 15 threat to invoke the Insurrection Act via social media, the legal ground in Minnesota v. DHS (Case No. 0:26-cv-00190) has shifted from a dispute over policy to a crisis of federalism.