NatSecNewsGuy
NatSecNewsGuy
@nlenk.bsky.social
They’re called submarines for a reason man!
December 23, 2025 at 1:34 AM
Why bother having an editor to even make a note of it at this point?
December 21, 2025 at 10:56 PM
Don’t worry, I’m not proud of it but if I ever vacate this platform I’ll be returning to the cesspool of Reddit.
December 14, 2025 at 11:24 PM
Congrats Marty!
December 13, 2025 at 5:09 PM
You may not like it, but this is what peak Friday looks like.
December 12, 2025 at 9:49 PM
Reposted by NatSecNewsGuy
The central challenge is convincing a critical mass of people – including the "influencer" / thought leader folks that others follow – to agree instead of going back to "it'll be fine with a few months of hard work"
December 6, 2025 at 4:42 PM
You did it, truly a one sentence horror story.
December 5, 2025 at 6:33 PM
What a fucking joke. We’re just completely fucking belligerently ignorant asswipes.
December 4, 2025 at 2:06 PM
Honestly I think just accepting that we should copy good systems that seem to work in other wars for ourselves actually does cross the bar as innovative enough in my book
December 4, 2025 at 2:58 AM
There will be blood, Fury Road, Shaun of the dead?
December 4, 2025 at 2:51 AM
I see you specified “ships are obligated…” which seems like enough of a potential loophole to fly a Reaper through.
November 28, 2025 at 6:32 PM
First one could work if it was actually properly cannisterized. Could vent exhaust gases whichever direction makes the most sense.
November 28, 2025 at 3:58 AM
5th circuit will save them the trouble, this will get reversed by them instantaneously and then SCOTUS will be able to decline the writ of cert in the case to keep their hands clean of it.
November 18, 2025 at 6:19 PM