@nattydaddy98.bsky.social
Reposted
Oh also I don't know if you already saw my Satanic Swift take but if not

sherdenpact.neocities.org/4thWall#Swift
Behind the Brush
sherdenpact.neocities.org
December 12, 2025 at 8:29 AM
man you have never disappointed me in your takes
December 12, 2025 at 8:06 AM
you missed your calling as a philosopher of science!
December 12, 2025 at 6:39 AM
that’s so interesting to me! i really thought of something like this while skimming the bultmann companion maybe its just a flase positive pattern match on my part en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indeter...
Indeterminacy of translation - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
December 2, 2025 at 10:00 PM
honestly maybe not in the god who saves (still struggling though that) but late congdon thought seems to be drifting to cognitive and social scientific influenced metaphysics
December 2, 2025 at 9:52 PM
yeah famously thought that there is no first philosophy,epistemology ought to be naturalized, and that our ontological commitments are limited to the objects in our best scientific theories (not a quine expert but he is definitely a fruitful thinker to engage with)
December 2, 2025 at 9:49 PM
it’s definitely the kind of work i hope progressive christians deal with … looks like galatians 3:28 isn’t the exegetical calling card we hope for
November 27, 2025 at 10:13 PM
ah thanks for the clarification … fwiw my understanding of emanuel’s work (totally non expert understanding) seems to cut against npp much harder
November 27, 2025 at 10:07 PM
just thought i’d drop this new book which seems to agree with simone’s take on pwj @dwcongdon.com www.fortresspress.com/store/produc...
Wrestling with Paul: The Apostle, His Readers, and the Fate of the Jews
Wrestling with Paul shows that scholars in a post-Holocaust world have often sanitized Paul's ethnocentric exclusivism in order to make him ahistorically
www.fortresspress.com
November 27, 2025 at 9:59 PM
bumps on head vs facial features??
November 6, 2025 at 11:36 PM
genes👏🏽code👏🏽for👏🏽proteins
November 6, 2025 at 9:31 AM
curious why you didn’t like it!
historical issues? or the law of iron explanation is wrong?
November 4, 2025 at 12:54 AM
this is a side benefit of taking finasteride for hair
October 28, 2025 at 6:01 AM
the biophysics one would have been ideal to give to hopfield
October 9, 2025 at 7:43 PM
antitrust book?
August 31, 2025 at 2:20 AM
your work would still be extremely valuable … i think this guy is a political theorist so you definitely have the comparative advantage in hermeneutical work … funnily enough tho i read the constructive proposal in the who is a true christian book as almost rawlsian in spirit
August 28, 2025 at 7:19 PM
this is a worse phelps wage subsidy
August 10, 2025 at 6:54 PM
has nothing to do with the thread but did you like superman 2025?
August 9, 2025 at 4:51 PM
call it synthetic theology riffing off of eric schliessers coining
July 25, 2025 at 4:05 PM