Ms. MishMash
@msmishmash.bsky.social
lurker gurl
<a href="https://www.flaticon.com/free-icons/girl" title="girl icons">Girl icons created by Freepik - Flaticon</a>
<a href="https://www.flaticon.com/free-icons/girl" title="girl icons">Girl icons created by Freepik - Flaticon</a>
"I created the system" - SURE you did, bud! Guess what? Right now you are in the privileged position of interacting with ME, the Queen of France!
"No soldier has defended ...": see pic for soldiers defending Americans in Saigon (as well as eligible S.Vietnamese)
"No soldier has defended ...": see pic for soldiers defending Americans in Saigon (as well as eligible S.Vietnamese)
December 9, 2025 at 12:18 AM
"I created the system" - SURE you did, bud! Guess what? Right now you are in the privileged position of interacting with ME, the Queen of France!
"No soldier has defended ...": see pic for soldiers defending Americans in Saigon (as well as eligible S.Vietnamese)
"No soldier has defended ...": see pic for soldiers defending Americans in Saigon (as well as eligible S.Vietnamese)
SUCH ignorance on display!
"trade disputes": There ARE no trade borders w/in the EU, ergo no disputes; as for externally, see its new free trade agreements (the OPPOSITE) with Canada, MERCOSUR, Australia
"cheese regulations": what is wrong with them? PROVE that in the EU they are somehow a "maze"!
"trade disputes": There ARE no trade borders w/in the EU, ergo no disputes; as for externally, see its new free trade agreements (the OPPOSITE) with Canada, MERCOSUR, Australia
"cheese regulations": what is wrong with them? PROVE that in the EU they are somehow a "maze"!
December 8, 2025 at 4:33 PM
SUCH ignorance on display!
"trade disputes": There ARE no trade borders w/in the EU, ergo no disputes; as for externally, see its new free trade agreements (the OPPOSITE) with Canada, MERCOSUR, Australia
"cheese regulations": what is wrong with them? PROVE that in the EU they are somehow a "maze"!
"trade disputes": There ARE no trade borders w/in the EU, ergo no disputes; as for externally, see its new free trade agreements (the OPPOSITE) with Canada, MERCOSUR, Australia
"cheese regulations": what is wrong with them? PROVE that in the EU they are somehow a "maze"!
Oh, think again! You TOO could have used a little looking-up (EASY on the Internet) of what "treason" actually means before going public
December 8, 2025 at 4:25 PM
Oh, think again! You TOO could have used a little looking-up (EASY on the Internet) of what "treason" actually means before going public
Maybe devote some of that energy FIRST to making sure you know how treason is defined in US law - right there in the Constitution, Art. III § 3 - before you embarrass yourself publicly like this & @fraziberry.bsky.social constitutioncenter.org/the-constitu...
December 8, 2025 at 3:52 PM
Maybe devote some of that energy FIRST to making sure you know how treason is defined in US law - right there in the Constitution, Art. III § 3 - before you embarrass yourself publicly like this & @fraziberry.bsky.social constitutioncenter.org/the-constitu...
No, you meant "AEI dominance"
December 8, 2025 at 2:54 PM
No, you meant "AEI dominance"
Sure, I'm all for these benefits of reading - but note they're being recited here by a librarian! (I would prefer ... say, a construction worker);
Once more, SOMEONE here is "talking one's own book"! www.sfchronicle.com/health/aging...
Once more, SOMEONE here is "talking one's own book"! www.sfchronicle.com/health/aging...
December 8, 2025 at 2:44 PM
Sure, I'm all for these benefits of reading - but note they're being recited here by a librarian! (I would prefer ... say, a construction worker);
Once more, SOMEONE here is "talking one's own book"! www.sfchronicle.com/health/aging...
Once more, SOMEONE here is "talking one's own book"! www.sfchronicle.com/health/aging...
"kind og nonsesne" in Danish means "cheek and sense-of-being a nun"! We should expect that?
(That certainly makes no sense in English)
OK, I know you're "Mr. Mirth" but this is a strange joke indeed!
(That certainly makes no sense in English)
OK, I know you're "Mr. Mirth" but this is a strange joke indeed!
December 8, 2025 at 2:39 PM
"kind og nonsesne" in Danish means "cheek and sense-of-being a nun"! We should expect that?
(That certainly makes no sense in English)
OK, I know you're "Mr. Mirth" but this is a strange joke indeed!
(That certainly makes no sense in English)
OK, I know you're "Mr. Mirth" but this is a strange joke indeed!
A confession, Adam? Have to admit that among those you list here are my absolute *favorite* books not to read!
December 8, 2025 at 2:25 PM
A confession, Adam? Have to admit that among those you list here are my absolute *favorite* books not to read!
I'll be here all day ... and it looks like, if I wait for an actual answer from you to my question, I'll be around for a LONG time!
December 7, 2025 at 9:38 PM
I'll be here all day ... and it looks like, if I wait for an actual answer from you to my question, I'll be around for a LONG time!
Uneditable, you say?
Prof. S. is more than intelligent enough to know the below bsky.app/profile/msmi...
Prof. S. is more than intelligent enough to know the below bsky.app/profile/msmi...
It is SUPREMELY evident by now how unaware you are of the ease with which Bsky posts with GROSS misspellings can be deleted and replaced so they are right - disgraceful!
December 7, 2025 at 12:36 PM
Uneditable, you say?
Prof. S. is more than intelligent enough to know the below bsky.app/profile/msmi...
Prof. S. is more than intelligent enough to know the below bsky.app/profile/msmi...
Interesting, thanks!
Note that @46n2Ahead.bsky.social simply wrote "The Constitution says" (not "The Supreme Court") and I asked "Where?"
Note that @46n2Ahead.bsky.social simply wrote "The Constitution says" (not "The Supreme Court") and I asked "Where?"
December 7, 2025 at 12:29 PM
Interesting, thanks!
Note that @46n2Ahead.bsky.social simply wrote "The Constitution says" (not "The Supreme Court") and I asked "Where?"
Note that @46n2Ahead.bsky.social simply wrote "The Constitution says" (not "The Supreme Court") and I asked "Where?"
... and "OP" would be ....?
December 7, 2025 at 12:27 PM
... and "OP" would be ....?
Not at all! @46n2Ahead.bsky.social simply wrote "The Constitution says" (not "The Supreme Court") and I simply ask "WHERE in the Constitution?" (Note how he has not answered)
December 7, 2025 at 12:27 PM
Not at all! @46n2Ahead.bsky.social simply wrote "The Constitution says" (not "The Supreme Court") and I simply ask "WHERE in the Constitution?" (Note how he has not answered)
Please note how @46n2Ahead.bsky.social wrote "The Constitution says," not "The Supreme Court" so my question - yet unanswered, I note - remains on-point
December 7, 2025 at 12:24 PM
Please note how @46n2Ahead.bsky.social wrote "The Constitution says," not "The Supreme Court" so my question - yet unanswered, I note - remains on-point
Oh c'mon now, this sort of sheer exaggeration only compounds your utter lack of credibility/credentials as shown by your Bsky bio and - this is not usual - by your choice of a name;
You know the meaning of "literally," right?
BTW it's "too"
You know the meaning of "literally," right?
BTW it's "too"
December 6, 2025 at 4:54 PM
Oh c'mon now, this sort of sheer exaggeration only compounds your utter lack of credibility/credentials as shown by your Bsky bio and - this is not usual - by your choice of a name;
You know the meaning of "literally," right?
BTW it's "too"
You know the meaning of "literally," right?
BTW it's "too"
Quite irrelevant - are you going to answer my question or not?
December 6, 2025 at 4:50 PM
Quite irrelevant - are you going to answer my question or not?
I agree with @winstonsmith2024.bsky.social, professor (altho Roberts hardly could do that alone):
SCOTUS alrdy rendered Section 3 meaningless in a prev case, so why not go for the rest of XIV now?
SCOTUS alrdy rendered Section 3 meaningless in a prev case, so why not go for the rest of XIV now?
December 6, 2025 at 4:49 PM
I agree with @winstonsmith2024.bsky.social, professor (altho Roberts hardly could do that alone):
SCOTUS alrdy rendered Section 3 meaningless in a prev case, so why not go for the rest of XIV now?
SCOTUS alrdy rendered Section 3 meaningless in a prev case, so why not go for the rest of XIV now?
WHO says that? Probably only you - and you are hardly qualified to pronounce on such things ...
Go ahead, give us the citation/link to this "until 250 years" business
Go ahead, give us the citation/link to this "until 250 years" business
December 6, 2025 at 4:48 PM
WHO says that? Probably only you - and you are hardly qualified to pronounce on such things ...
Go ahead, give us the citation/link to this "until 250 years" business
Go ahead, give us the citation/link to this "until 250 years" business
No the Constitution does not say that - where? Give me Article/Section if you are so sure
December 6, 2025 at 4:45 PM
No the Constitution does not say that - where? Give me Article/Section if you are so sure
Irrelevant to this thread - no one said anything about voting
December 6, 2025 at 4:44 PM
Irrelevant to this thread - no one said anything about voting
Um ... yes the good Prof wrote "Section," we must presume deliberately so, we must presume he means Section 3 to Amendment XIV which is his subject
December 6, 2025 at 4:43 PM
Um ... yes the good Prof wrote "Section," we must presume deliberately so, we must presume he means Section 3 to Amendment XIV which is his subject
Not "Exactly" at all!
First: What you cite has nothing to do with Prof. Snyder's post;
Second: You're referring to Trump, I don't believe he actually "railed" as you said he has, so provide instances when he did
First: What you cite has nothing to do with Prof. Snyder's post;
Second: You're referring to Trump, I don't believe he actually "railed" as you said he has, so provide instances when he did
December 6, 2025 at 4:40 PM
Not "Exactly" at all!
First: What you cite has nothing to do with Prof. Snyder's post;
Second: You're referring to Trump, I don't believe he actually "railed" as you said he has, so provide instances when he did
First: What you cite has nothing to do with Prof. Snyder's post;
Second: You're referring to Trump, I don't believe he actually "railed" as you said he has, so provide instances when he did
And I came to say how EASY it actually is to delete any post you make, so you can re-do it so it is right!
... all while you go off on OTHERS being stupid
... all while you go off on OTHERS being stupid
December 6, 2025 at 1:06 PM
And I came to say how EASY it actually is to delete any post you make, so you can re-do it so it is right!
... all while you go off on OTHERS being stupid
... all while you go off on OTHERS being stupid
WHAT sounds like an Onion headline? "Everyone knows the Supreme Court is working ..."
We actually cannot read your mind, to know what you mean
We actually cannot read your mind, to know what you mean
December 6, 2025 at 10:54 AM
WHAT sounds like an Onion headline? "Everyone knows the Supreme Court is working ..."
We actually cannot read your mind, to know what you mean
We actually cannot read your mind, to know what you mean