Keith (vibe spreadsheeter)
@mosheroperandi.bsky.social
Computer knower. Urbanism advocater. Hobbyist law nerd. Accused fiat shill.
[dogmatic sedevacantist voice] every day we are one day further from when Trump left office
November 25, 2025 at 12:46 PM
[dogmatic sedevacantist voice] every day we are one day further from when Trump left office
Reposted by Keith (vibe spreadsheeter)
Alternate timeline where G+ happened and they’re both brainrotted reply guys
November 25, 2025 at 12:37 AM
Alternate timeline where G+ happened and they’re both brainrotted reply guys
ngl, I'd eat the hell out of that garlic spaghetti.
November 25, 2025 at 11:36 AM
ngl, I'd eat the hell out of that garlic spaghetti.
We'll have to see first if it disappears.
Would not be surprised if this is "Normal Government" just doing its thing. The IRS will tend to come for you if you owe $5m.
And only after it hits the news will Trump learn and pass down the guidance "no, we don't do that to Republicans anymore"
Would not be surprised if this is "Normal Government" just doing its thing. The IRS will tend to come for you if you owe $5m.
And only after it hits the news will Trump learn and pass down the guidance "no, we don't do that to Republicans anymore"
November 25, 2025 at 11:28 AM
We'll have to see first if it disappears.
Would not be surprised if this is "Normal Government" just doing its thing. The IRS will tend to come for you if you owe $5m.
And only after it hits the news will Trump learn and pass down the guidance "no, we don't do that to Republicans anymore"
Would not be surprised if this is "Normal Government" just doing its thing. The IRS will tend to come for you if you owe $5m.
And only after it hits the news will Trump learn and pass down the guidance "no, we don't do that to Republicans anymore"
www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications...
no need to guess, your government has done this research. elk are indeed meatier, but deer make it up in numbers.
no need to guess, your government has done this research. elk are indeed meatier, but deer make it up in numbers.
November 25, 2025 at 5:48 AM
www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications...
no need to guess, your government has done this research. elk are indeed meatier, but deer make it up in numbers.
no need to guess, your government has done this research. elk are indeed meatier, but deer make it up in numbers.
That and his 2nd term wouldn't have been half as evil as this one
November 25, 2025 at 5:17 AM
That and his 2nd term wouldn't have been half as evil as this one
Ride so low it's 6 under
November 25, 2025 at 5:08 AM
Ride so low it's 6 under
Why not both?
November 25, 2025 at 5:04 AM
Why not both?
Reposted by Keith (vibe spreadsheeter)
and they are all valid.
However, being from the Xmas prime rib sect myself, I do consider it more valid.
However, being from the Xmas prime rib sect myself, I do consider it more valid.
November 25, 2025 at 2:50 AM
and they are all valid.
However, being from the Xmas prime rib sect myself, I do consider it more valid.
However, being from the Xmas prime rib sect myself, I do consider it more valid.
that would be the obvious arg if Bondi can manage to install another mook willing to reindict.
Comey would say 3288 doesn't trigger because "an indictment" wasn't dismissed. Government would argue "for any reason" includes "void ab initio". And then much later an appeals court tells us who's right.
Comey would say 3288 doesn't trigger because "an indictment" wasn't dismissed. Government would argue "for any reason" includes "void ab initio". And then much later an appeals court tells us who's right.
November 25, 2025 at 1:25 AM
that would be the obvious arg if Bondi can manage to install another mook willing to reindict.
Comey would say 3288 doesn't trigger because "an indictment" wasn't dismissed. Government would argue "for any reason" includes "void ab initio". And then much later an appeals court tells us who's right.
Comey would say 3288 doesn't trigger because "an indictment" wasn't dismissed. Government would argue "for any reason" includes "void ab initio". And then much later an appeals court tells us who's right.