If you’re behind, your only chance to win is if the leader misses. And this leader is very, very good.
Don’t bet anything! You win if he misses, whether you’re right or not!
If you’re behind, your only chance to win is if the leader misses. And this leader is very, very good.
Don’t bet anything! You win if he misses, whether you’re right or not!
In this example, there’s no way the player in the lead should win if all three miss Final. But all three missed, and she won anyway. Inexcusable mistake by the other two.
In this example, there’s no way the player in the lead should win if all three miss Final. But all three missed, and she won anyway. Inexcusable mistake by the other two.
Also, I’m not sure you read, because your latter point was covered. The voters are capable of weighing the importance of the games missed. Should 65 above-average games make a player more qualified for MVP than a guy who played 64 spectacular ones?
Also, I’m not sure you read, because your latter point was covered. The voters are capable of weighing the importance of the games missed. Should 65 above-average games make a player more qualified for MVP than a guy who played 64 spectacular ones?
uproxx.com/country/todd...
uproxx.com/country/todd...