Well played, gentlemen!

The point is: lots of people will have accepted the first image because it looks kind of right and it's on an art page. The doctored image is already turning up in search results. We are cooked if we don't start to push back against this stuff. AI is poisonous to human endeavour, pass it on <end>

I saw those and considered applying, yet didn't felt it would fit.
That said, I may have something for your next round ;)

looks cute already!

I am begging people to *please* stop using these tools to make a point or make fun of them. We do not need to further refine them or kill the planet to make a point. We should stop using them to make them irrelevant.

An excerpt from the “Should I Use an LLM?” section of my syllabi. 🎢

In the age of AI slop, true expertise is even more important to value.

Experts are the people who get so annoyed about the precise way to describe something they dedicate their lives to it (see excellent blog: www.experimental-history.com/p/thank-you-...).

We need them and their journals.

7.2/n

A coherent text on coherence is badly needed!

I've heard of similar thing happen in the group about a decade ago.
Maybe worth asking EiC?

Nice to finally see some inversion of the typical work Denglish!

Well, they need to play early adopters game as well, otherwise other communities may point fingers and not use their results!