Matt Bury, MA Online & Distance Ed & AppLing 🇪🇸
banner
matbury.bsky.social
Matt Bury, MA Online & Distance Ed & AppLing 🇪🇸
@matbury.bsky.social
MA Online & Distance Education & Applied Linguistics | ELT, CALL, Instructional Design, & Moodle 🇬🇧 🇪🇸 🇪🇺 https://matbury.com/
I think the answers to these questions will be helpful to instructors struggling with students' abuses of LLMs.
December 3, 2025 at 11:50 AM
10! Yes, this comment is deliberately persuasive language but not written by an LLM! 🤓
December 3, 2025 at 11:41 AM
9/9 In the end, students have to actually be able to do the hard critical thinking unaided. It's about developing the cognitive strength for that, i.e. cognitive workouts, rather than taking all the effort out of the process.
December 3, 2025 at 11:41 AM
8/9 But "short-circuiting" generative learning activities with an LLM will more than likely reduce learning, not support it.
December 3, 2025 at 11:41 AM
7/9 There is definitely benefit from purposefully observing others perform critical thinking learning activities (the worked example effect) & examining finished products of critical thinking (what John Hattie calls "success criteria").
December 3, 2025 at 11:40 AM
6/9 Simply put: LLMs = No SOI = No critical thinking about the learning content
December 3, 2025 at 11:40 AM
5/9 Reading the results of someone or something else's SOI activities isn't the same as students actually doing the SOI themselves. It's like trying to get fit by looking at athletes.
December 3, 2025 at 11:40 AM
4/9 Using an LLM prevents or at least discourages students from engaging in learning activities that require them to select, organise, & integrate information. Reading the results of someone or something else's SOI activities isn't the same as students actually doing the SOI themselves.
December 3, 2025 at 11:40 AM
3/9 Students mostly learn the content thoroughly through activities that include selecting, organising, & integrating (SOI) elements from the content (the so called "SOI principle" AKA learning as a generative activity - See the work of Logan Fiorella et al.).
December 3, 2025 at 11:40 AM
2/9 Students won't get to the point of being able to think critically about learning content if they haven't learnt it thoroughly enough.
December 3, 2025 at 11:40 AM
7/7 ELT specific: Swan, M. (2008). Talking Sense about Learning Strategies. RELC Journal, 39(2), 262–273. doi.org/10.1177/0033...
Talking Sense about Learning Strategies - Michael Swan, 2008
Judicious training in the use of learning strategies can be very valuable for language students. However, the notion of `strategy' is not always well defin...
doi.org
December 2, 2025 at 1:16 AM
6/7 In general: Willingham, D. (2006). The Usefulness of Brief Instruction in Reading Comprehension Strategies [Institution Website]. American Federation of Teachers. www.aft.org/ae/winter200...
Ask the Cognitive Scientist: The Usefulness of Brief Instruction in Reading Comprehension Strategies
www.aft.org
December 2, 2025 at 1:16 AM
5/7 Here's a couple of position pieces that review the best available evidence & discuss the problems with teaching all reading strategies to all students:
December 2, 2025 at 1:16 AM
4/7 When you ask a real expert, "It's complicated." or "It depends." is what they'll typically say. It's a good idea to listen to what these experts have to say. Our students are depending on us to understand & act on it.
December 2, 2025 at 1:16 AM
3/7 That's not true.
December 2, 2025 at 1:16 AM
2/7 Predictably, it just listed the well-known strategies that we see in most ITE programmes & embedded in typical coursebooks... all assuming that they're always good for all students all the time.
December 2, 2025 at 1:15 AM