@masterdepot.bsky.social
The Don't Tread on Me guys are totally cool with the government not treading on everyone else, just as long as it's not them.
They're totally cool with tyranny, as long as it's tyranny against the others.
They're totally cool with tyranny, as long as it's tyranny against the others.
November 9, 2025 at 3:11 AM
The Don't Tread on Me guys are totally cool with the government not treading on everyone else, just as long as it's not them.
They're totally cool with tyranny, as long as it's tyranny against the others.
They're totally cool with tyranny, as long as it's tyranny against the others.
Weak ass mind. Weak ass spirit.
Stfu.
Stfu.
November 8, 2025 at 10:18 PM
Weak ass mind. Weak ass spirit.
Stfu.
Stfu.
They don't give pullitzers for tweets, but they should, and that one should be a top nominee.
November 6, 2025 at 11:02 PM
They don't give pullitzers for tweets, but they should, and that one should be a top nominee.
fuck off with that.
i pointed out specific strategic failures that cost them.
having a vagina is not enough to be elected President.
Dont sit there and tell me that a black man named Barack Obama has more social capital than a white former first lady.
i pointed out specific strategic failures that cost them.
having a vagina is not enough to be elected President.
Dont sit there and tell me that a black man named Barack Obama has more social capital than a white former first lady.
October 28, 2025 at 7:00 PM
fuck off with that.
i pointed out specific strategic failures that cost them.
having a vagina is not enough to be elected President.
Dont sit there and tell me that a black man named Barack Obama has more social capital than a white former first lady.
i pointed out specific strategic failures that cost them.
having a vagina is not enough to be elected President.
Dont sit there and tell me that a black man named Barack Obama has more social capital than a white former first lady.
you're trying to get me to indict the administration when i am trying to highlight the good things he did to win, which he did.
I'm not an Obama stan and he was far from ideal.
But the 1 thing he did is prove a populist can get elected.
I'm not an Obama stan and he was far from ideal.
But the 1 thing he did is prove a populist can get elected.
October 27, 2025 at 11:55 PM
you're trying to get me to indict the administration when i am trying to highlight the good things he did to win, which he did.
I'm not an Obama stan and he was far from ideal.
But the 1 thing he did is prove a populist can get elected.
I'm not an Obama stan and he was far from ideal.
But the 1 thing he did is prove a populist can get elected.
either address my point or stop talking to me.
October 27, 2025 at 11:51 PM
either address my point or stop talking to me.
wtf are you even talking about?
either address the points I am making or dont bother. you're insane.
either address the points I am making or dont bother. you're insane.
October 27, 2025 at 11:50 PM
wtf are you even talking about?
either address the points I am making or dont bother. you're insane.
either address the points I am making or dont bother. you're insane.
-- he didn't make any blunders like not campaigning in Wisconsin, or campaigning with the Cheneys, or promising continued support for a genocide.
You get the idea.
You get the idea.
October 27, 2025 at 8:03 PM
-- he didn't make any blunders like not campaigning in Wisconsin, or campaigning with the Cheneys, or promising continued support for a genocide.
You get the idea.
You get the idea.
I wasn't praising his administration. There were a lot of betrayals, foreign and domestic. But I am talking about the 2008 campaign. Not only did he craft a good message around a populist set of policies, he also made the right moves strategically to get past any racial biases and still win.--
October 27, 2025 at 8:00 PM
I wasn't praising his administration. There were a lot of betrayals, foreign and domestic. But I am talking about the 2008 campaign. Not only did he craft a good message around a populist set of policies, he also made the right moves strategically to get past any racial biases and still win.--
See how you focused on Obama to avoid talking about the popularity of Bernie, AOC, and Mamdani.
Either you are a dishonest debater, or you just can't read.
Either you are a dishonest debater, or you just can't read.
October 27, 2025 at 7:58 PM
See how you focused on Obama to avoid talking about the popularity of Bernie, AOC, and Mamdani.
Either you are a dishonest debater, or you just can't read.
Either you are a dishonest debater, or you just can't read.
nd just to reiterate, I mentioned Bernie, AOC, Mamdani, and how the Democratic leadership has moved to squash him when he has momentum, and you never addressed it.
Who/what are you going to blame next?
FDR? Jesus? The weather?
Who/what are you going to blame next?
FDR? Jesus? The weather?
October 27, 2025 at 7:54 PM
nd just to reiterate, I mentioned Bernie, AOC, Mamdani, and how the Democratic leadership has moved to squash him when he has momentum, and you never addressed it.
Who/what are you going to blame next?
FDR? Jesus? The weather?
Who/what are you going to blame next?
FDR? Jesus? The weather?
"Rashida Tlaib is silent"? Get the fuck out of here.
You only get your info from CNN, so you dont see here, but trust, she is out here just like she has always been.
You're grasping at straws to blame everyone but your favorite idols.
You only get your info from CNN, so you dont see here, but trust, she is out here just like she has always been.
You're grasping at straws to blame everyone but your favorite idols.
October 27, 2025 at 7:53 PM
"Rashida Tlaib is silent"? Get the fuck out of here.
You only get your info from CNN, so you dont see here, but trust, she is out here just like she has always been.
You're grasping at straws to blame everyone but your favorite idols.
You only get your info from CNN, so you dont see here, but trust, she is out here just like she has always been.
You're grasping at straws to blame everyone but your favorite idols.
What's incredibly privileged is for you to ignore policy failures in favor of empty ass identity politics. You don't acknowledge corruption. You don't acknowledge the donor class. You only care about the color your idol comes in, and not what they do once in power.
October 27, 2025 at 7:47 PM
What's incredibly privileged is for you to ignore policy failures in favor of empty ass identity politics. You don't acknowledge corruption. You don't acknowledge the donor class. You only care about the color your idol comes in, and not what they do once in power.
The Obama of 2008 would not only have won, he would have kicked Trump's ass. How do I know this? Look at the only people in the party with any sort of momentum. Bernie, AOC, Mamdani.
And why? Because their platform is based on policies most Americans want.
And why? Because their platform is based on policies most Americans want.
October 27, 2025 at 3:22 AM
The Obama of 2008 would not only have won, he would have kicked Trump's ass. How do I know this? Look at the only people in the party with any sort of momentum. Bernie, AOC, Mamdani.
And why? Because their platform is based on policies most Americans want.
And why? Because their platform is based on policies most Americans want.
1. I love how you didn't address my point about how she was up before she pivoted hard right.
2. I'm privileged because I want the candidates to be better so they can win?
2. I'm privileged because I want the candidates to be better so they can win?
October 27, 2025 at 3:19 AM
1. I love how you didn't address my point about how she was up before she pivoted hard right.
2. I'm privileged because I want the candidates to be better so they can win?
2. I'm privileged because I want the candidates to be better so they can win?
They're not even opposing fascism, and the electorate agrees. Look at their polling and tell me you believe the Democrats are doing a good job standing up to MAGA.
October 27, 2025 at 3:18 AM
They're not even opposing fascism, and the electorate agrees. Look at their polling and tell me you believe the Democrats are doing a good job standing up to MAGA.
Limiting corporations from doing whatever the fuck they want? That's crazy talk!
October 26, 2025 at 6:44 PM
Limiting corporations from doing whatever the fuck they want? That's crazy talk!
So you can blame it on racism all you want, but facts are facts.
You sound extra ridiculous considering this country elected a black guy named Barack HUSSEIN Obama 2x, handily.
This country is racist, to a point. Kamala had an avenue to victory and she blew it. That's on her, and her stans like you.
You sound extra ridiculous considering this country elected a black guy named Barack HUSSEIN Obama 2x, handily.
This country is racist, to a point. Kamala had an avenue to victory and she blew it. That's on her, and her stans like you.
October 26, 2025 at 6:43 PM
So you can blame it on racism all you want, but facts are facts.
You sound extra ridiculous considering this country elected a black guy named Barack HUSSEIN Obama 2x, handily.
This country is racist, to a point. Kamala had an avenue to victory and she blew it. That's on her, and her stans like you.
You sound extra ridiculous considering this country elected a black guy named Barack HUSSEIN Obama 2x, handily.
This country is racist, to a point. Kamala had an avenue to victory and she blew it. That's on her, and her stans like you.
Case in point: despite have 100 days, you're leaving out the fact that she was up big, around the time she announced Waltz as her VP. Then what happened? Consultants (and donors) got in her ear and suddenly, she's campaigning with the Cheneys, and coming down hard on immigration.
October 26, 2025 at 6:40 PM
Case in point: despite have 100 days, you're leaving out the fact that she was up big, around the time she announced Waltz as her VP. Then what happened? Consultants (and donors) got in her ear and suddenly, she's campaigning with the Cheneys, and coming down hard on immigration.
Again, you're cherry picking facts and leaving out context to create a false narrative, because you are so far gone, you would blame protestors for the Dems.' failure, rather than challenge the party candidates to do better.
October 26, 2025 at 6:37 PM
Again, you're cherry picking facts and leaving out context to create a false narrative, because you are so far gone, you would blame protestors for the Dems.' failure, rather than challenge the party candidates to do better.