Maarten van Smeden
@maartenvsmeden.bsky.social
statistician • associate prof • team lead health data science and head methods research program at julius center • director ai methods lab, umc utrecht, netherlands • views and opinions my own
Manuscript_Final_Version_actualFINALcopy_version9b_USETHISONE.docx
November 14, 2025 at 2:16 PM
Manuscript_Final_Version_actualFINALcopy_version9b_USETHISONE.docx
Kind reminder: data driven variable selection (e.g. forward/stepwise/univariable screening) makes things *worse* for most analytical goals
October 8, 2025 at 1:38 PM
Kind reminder: data driven variable selection (e.g. forward/stepwise/univariable screening) makes things *worse* for most analytical goals
NEW FULLY FUNDED PHD POSITION
Looking for a motivated PhD candidate to join our team. Together with Danya Muilwijk, Jeffrey Beekman and I, you will explore opportunities and limitations of AI in the context of organoids
For more info and for applying 👉
www.careersatumcutrecht.com/vacancies/sc...
Looking for a motivated PhD candidate to join our team. Together with Danya Muilwijk, Jeffrey Beekman and I, you will explore opportunities and limitations of AI in the context of organoids
For more info and for applying 👉
www.careersatumcutrecht.com/vacancies/sc...
Vacancy — PhD position on AI methodology for prediction of patient outcomes using organoid models
Are you passionate about bringing personalized medicine to the next level and make real impact in healthcare? Join our team and develop novel AI methodology to improve predictions of relevant patient ...
www.careersatumcutrecht.com
September 25, 2025 at 10:57 AM
NEW FULLY FUNDED PHD POSITION
Looking for a motivated PhD candidate to join our team. Together with Danya Muilwijk, Jeffrey Beekman and I, you will explore opportunities and limitations of AI in the context of organoids
For more info and for applying 👉
www.careersatumcutrecht.com/vacancies/sc...
Looking for a motivated PhD candidate to join our team. Together with Danya Muilwijk, Jeffrey Beekman and I, you will explore opportunities and limitations of AI in the context of organoids
For more info and for applying 👉
www.careersatumcutrecht.com/vacancies/sc...
Reposted by Maarten van Smeden
Interpretable "AI" is just a distraction from safe and useful "AI"
September 22, 2024 at 7:31 PM
Interpretable "AI" is just a distraction from safe and useful "AI"
No.
5. You should use a precision-recall curve for a binary classifier, not an ROC curve
August 19, 2025 at 3:22 PM
No.
I wonder who those people are who come here dying to know what GenAI has done with some prompt you put in
August 13, 2025 at 9:21 AM
I wonder who those people are who come here dying to know what GenAI has done with some prompt you put in
If you think AI is cool, wait until you learn about regression analysis
August 12, 2025 at 11:44 AM
If you think AI is cool, wait until you learn about regression analysis
NEW PREPRINT
Explainable AI refers to an extremely popular group of approaches that aim to open "black box" AI models. But what can we see when we open the black AI box? We use Galit Shmueli's framework (to describe, predict or explain) to evaluate
arxiv.org/abs/2508.05753
Explainable AI refers to an extremely popular group of approaches that aim to open "black box" AI models. But what can we see when we open the black AI box? We use Galit Shmueli's framework (to describe, predict or explain) to evaluate
arxiv.org/abs/2508.05753
August 11, 2025 at 6:53 AM
NEW PREPRINT
Explainable AI refers to an extremely popular group of approaches that aim to open "black box" AI models. But what can we see when we open the black AI box? We use Galit Shmueli's framework (to describe, predict or explain) to evaluate
arxiv.org/abs/2508.05753
Explainable AI refers to an extremely popular group of approaches that aim to open "black box" AI models. But what can we see when we open the black AI box? We use Galit Shmueli's framework (to describe, predict or explain) to evaluate
arxiv.org/abs/2508.05753
The healthcare literature is filled with "risk factors". This word combination makes research findings sound important by implying causality, while avoiding direct claims of having identified causal associations that are easily critiqued.
July 31, 2025 at 8:32 AM
The healthcare literature is filled with "risk factors". This word combination makes research findings sound important by implying causality, while avoiding direct claims of having identified causal associations that are easily critiqued.
When forced to make a choice, my choice will be logistic regression model over linear probability model 103% of the time
July 23, 2025 at 8:43 PM
When forced to make a choice, my choice will be logistic regression model over linear probability model 103% of the time
Reposted by Maarten van Smeden
Post just up: Is multiple imputation making up information?
tldr: no.
Includes a cheeky simulation study to demonstrate the point.
open.substack.com/pub/tpmorris...
tldr: no.
Includes a cheeky simulation study to demonstrate the point.
open.substack.com/pub/tpmorris...
July 23, 2025 at 3:29 PM
Post just up: Is multiple imputation making up information?
tldr: no.
Includes a cheeky simulation study to demonstrate the point.
open.substack.com/pub/tpmorris...
tldr: no.
Includes a cheeky simulation study to demonstrate the point.
open.substack.com/pub/tpmorris...
Reposted by Maarten van Smeden
You can have all the omni-omics data in the world and the bestest algorithms, but eventually a predicted probability is produced & it should be evaluated using well-established methods, and correctly implemented in the context of medical decision making.
statsepi.substack.com/i/140315566/...
statsepi.substack.com/i/140315566/...
July 14, 2025 at 9:49 AM
You can have all the omni-omics data in the world and the bestest algorithms, but eventually a predicted probability is produced & it should be evaluated using well-established methods, and correctly implemented in the context of medical decision making.
statsepi.substack.com/i/140315566/...
statsepi.substack.com/i/140315566/...
Depending which methods guru you ask every analytical task is “essentially” a missing data problem, a causal inference problem, a Bayesian problem, a regression problem or a machine learning problem
July 10, 2025 at 3:05 PM
Depending which methods guru you ask every analytical task is “essentially” a missing data problem, a causal inference problem, a Bayesian problem, a regression problem or a machine learning problem
Reposted by Maarten van Smeden
Reposted by Maarten van Smeden
* New preprint led by Joao Matos & @gscollins.bsky.social
"Critical Appraisal of Fairness Metrics in Clinical Predictive AI"
- Important, rapidly growing area
- But confusion exists
- 62 fairness metrics identified so far
- Better standards & metrics needed for healthcare
arxiv.org/abs/2506.17035
"Critical Appraisal of Fairness Metrics in Clinical Predictive AI"
- Important, rapidly growing area
- But confusion exists
- 62 fairness metrics identified so far
- Better standards & metrics needed for healthcare
arxiv.org/abs/2506.17035
June 27, 2025 at 6:57 AM
* New preprint led by Joao Matos & @gscollins.bsky.social
"Critical Appraisal of Fairness Metrics in Clinical Predictive AI"
- Important, rapidly growing area
- But confusion exists
- 62 fairness metrics identified so far
- Better standards & metrics needed for healthcare
arxiv.org/abs/2506.17035
"Critical Appraisal of Fairness Metrics in Clinical Predictive AI"
- Important, rapidly growing area
- But confusion exists
- 62 fairness metrics identified so far
- Better standards & metrics needed for healthcare
arxiv.org/abs/2506.17035
Surprisingly common thing: comparisons of prediction models developed using, say, Logistic Regression, Random Forest and XGBoost with conclusion XGBoost is "good" because it yields slightly higher AUC than LR or RF using the same data
Fact that "better" doesn't always mean "good" seems lost
Fact that "better" doesn't always mean "good" seems lost
June 27, 2025 at 7:34 AM
Surprisingly common thing: comparisons of prediction models developed using, say, Logistic Regression, Random Forest and XGBoost with conclusion XGBoost is "good" because it yields slightly higher AUC than LR or RF using the same data
Fact that "better" doesn't always mean "good" seems lost
Fact that "better" doesn't always mean "good" seems lost
Reposted by Maarten van Smeden
Published: the paper 'On the uses and abuses of Regression Models: a Call for Reform of Statistical Practice and Teaching' by John Carlin and Margarita Moreno-Betancur in the latest issue of Statistics in Medicine onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/... (1/8)
onlinelibrary.wiley.com
June 26, 2025 at 12:23 PM
Published: the paper 'On the uses and abuses of Regression Models: a Call for Reform of Statistical Practice and Teaching' by John Carlin and Margarita Moreno-Betancur in the latest issue of Statistics in Medicine onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/... (1/8)
What is common knowledge in your field, but shocks outsiders?
Validated does not mean it works as intended. It means someone has evaluated it (and may have concluded it doesn’t work at all)
Validated does not mean it works as intended. It means someone has evaluated it (and may have concluded it doesn’t work at all)
What is common knowledge in your field, but shocks outsiders?
We're not clear on what peer review is, at all.
We're not clear on what peer review is, at all.
What is common knowledge in your field, but shocks outsiders?
We’re not clear on what intelligence is, at all
We’re not clear on what intelligence is, at all
June 17, 2025 at 6:44 AM
What is common knowledge in your field, but shocks outsiders?
Validated does not mean it works as intended. It means someone has evaluated it (and may have concluded it doesn’t work at all)
Validated does not mean it works as intended. It means someone has evaluated it (and may have concluded it doesn’t work at all)
Reposted by Maarten van Smeden
**New Lancet DH paper**
"Importance of sample size on the quality & utility of AI-based prediction models for healthcare"
- for broad audience
- explains why inadequate SS harms #AI model training, evaluation & performance
- pushback to claims SS irrelevant to AI research
👇
tinyurl.com/yrje52fn
"Importance of sample size on the quality & utility of AI-based prediction models for healthcare"
- for broad audience
- explains why inadequate SS harms #AI model training, evaluation & performance
- pushback to claims SS irrelevant to AI research
👇
tinyurl.com/yrje52fn
Importance of sample size on the quality and utility of AI-based prediction models for healthcare
Rigorous study design and analytical standards are required to generate reliable findings in healthcare from artificial intelligence (AI) research. On…
www.sciencedirect.com
June 2, 2025 at 3:18 PM
**New Lancet DH paper**
"Importance of sample size on the quality & utility of AI-based prediction models for healthcare"
- for broad audience
- explains why inadequate SS harms #AI model training, evaluation & performance
- pushback to claims SS irrelevant to AI research
👇
tinyurl.com/yrje52fn
"Importance of sample size on the quality & utility of AI-based prediction models for healthcare"
- for broad audience
- explains why inadequate SS harms #AI model training, evaluation & performance
- pushback to claims SS irrelevant to AI research
👇
tinyurl.com/yrje52fn
Reposted by Maarten van Smeden
People always ask me, “how do I know my manuscript is done?”
There’s only one way, my friends.
If your file name looks something like this:
Manuscript - Final Draft 3.7 FINAL FINAL - FINAL (5).docx
Then, and only then, is it time.
There’s only one way, my friends.
If your file name looks something like this:
Manuscript - Final Draft 3.7 FINAL FINAL - FINAL (5).docx
Then, and only then, is it time.
May 31, 2025 at 9:17 PM
People always ask me, “how do I know my manuscript is done?”
There’s only one way, my friends.
If your file name looks something like this:
Manuscript - Final Draft 3.7 FINAL FINAL - FINAL (5).docx
Then, and only then, is it time.
There’s only one way, my friends.
If your file name looks something like this:
Manuscript - Final Draft 3.7 FINAL FINAL - FINAL (5).docx
Then, and only then, is it time.
Re-proposing the Occam's taser: an automatic electric shock for anyone riding the AI hype train making their models unnecessarily complex
May 27, 2025 at 2:38 PM
Re-proposing the Occam's taser: an automatic electric shock for anyone riding the AI hype train making their models unnecessarily complex
Rule of thumb: If your model requires data to look like this (balanced after SMOTE), then maybe you want to use a different model
May 27, 2025 at 1:43 PM
Rule of thumb: If your model requires data to look like this (balanced after SMOTE), then maybe you want to use a different model
We should really ban all use of AI from all our education because the use of AI will make our students dumb, and banning innovation has worked really well before
May 19, 2025 at 2:32 PM
We should really ban all use of AI from all our education because the use of AI will make our students dumb, and banning innovation has worked really well before
As scientists it is difficult to stay in love with the questions once you fall in love with the answers
May 19, 2025 at 9:14 AM
As scientists it is difficult to stay in love with the questions once you fall in love with the answers
Reposted by Maarten van Smeden
May 14, 2025 at 11:21 AM