Lynn Dee
@lynndee.bsky.social
Reposted by Lynn Dee
And yet they didn't cave bsky.app/profile/john...
This should be the biggest story in the country right now. The sitting US President was extorting state lawmakers from his own party by threatening to withhold public money if they didn’t gerrymander for him.
I don’t know how else to say it…
I don’t know how else to say it…
December 12, 2025 at 7:51 PM
And yet they didn't cave bsky.app/profile/john...
Nate Silver is beginning to remind me of Scott Adams.
December 13, 2025 at 11:16 PM
Nate Silver is beginning to remind me of Scott Adams.
Is it high-end? It‘s so trashy. But it does look like housekeeping comes through on a regular basis, so there’s that.
December 13, 2025 at 11:15 PM
Is it high-end? It‘s so trashy. But it does look like housekeeping comes through on a regular basis, so there’s that.
Just officiously sweeping up, I’m sure he or she would say!
December 12, 2025 at 2:38 PM
Just officiously sweeping up, I’m sure he or she would say!
A showing isn’t required for a court to do this. But six years back and under these circumstances is utterly transparent. An arrogant abuse of power, imo
December 12, 2025 at 2:32 PM
A showing isn’t required for a court to do this. But six years back and under these circumstances is utterly transparent. An arrogant abuse of power, imo
No new order. Nunc pro tunc means “now for then.“ So the order was entered now, for then (six years back), on the court’s own initiative (sua sponte), meaning not on the motion of a party.
December 12, 2025 at 2:25 PM
No new order. Nunc pro tunc means “now for then.“ So the order was entered now, for then (six years back), on the court’s own initiative (sua sponte), meaning not on the motion of a party.
Sua sponte and nunc pro tunc aren’t arcane phrases. But to nunc pro tunc an order six years back, and out of thin air, is mind-boggling.
December 12, 2025 at 2:19 PM
Sua sponte and nunc pro tunc aren’t arcane phrases. But to nunc pro tunc an order six years back, and out of thin air, is mind-boggling.
Reposted by Lynn Dee
BREAKING: At 7am ET, in response to the emergency overnight filing, Judge Xinis issued a TRO barring the Trump administration from re-detaining Abrego Garcia.
www.courtlistener.com/docket/71191...
www.courtlistener.com/docket/71191...
Memorandum and Order – #114 in Abrego Garcia v. Noem (D. Maryland, 8:25-cv-02780) – CourtListener.com
MEMORANDUM ORDER granting 112 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order; Respondents are enjoined from re-detaining Petitioner in ICE custody until this Court can receive further briefing from the partie...
www.courtlistener.com
December 12, 2025 at 12:48 PM
BREAKING: At 7am ET, in response to the emergency overnight filing, Judge Xinis issued a TRO barring the Trump administration from re-detaining Abrego Garcia.
www.courtlistener.com/docket/71191...
www.courtlistener.com/docket/71191...
It is. I’m still surprised … and gratified.
December 12, 2025 at 2:11 PM
It is. I’m still surprised … and gratified.