So what you'd like to spend the money on instead is means testing and hassling disabled people with a bureaucracy - one that will alternately grow bloated or be weaponized to hurt those it ought to assist as a cost-saving measure.

I see no problems here and consider all these valid.

Right? It's got some neat little features which actually CAN be framed as features, if you do it right.

This makes me go "Nature and Demeanour, but Alignment".

I DEMAND THAT YOU RESUME.

I suspect it's likely to stick even *better* than it ever did to techno musicians, because it's more visibly true.

There are for sure people deploying these things as just one new tool in their drawer, with skill (whatever opinion of their ethic applies), but the amateur slop rush IS lazy.

Makes me think of Uwe Boll. You get all the shots you want, if you're doing comedy. But, like, genuine anger about how bad he is and disparaging of people having fun watching his stuff... Wouldn't make *him* look bad.

Like, I'm used to the *moments* of "My god, so many our arguments are about absurdly small shit" that anyone buried in discourse has, but rolling around in the grass a bit sure drives that fucking point home.

They say.

It very much appears that "we don't train AI on this!" has, at this point, surpassed greenwashing as a topic of corporate lying.