Yeah but i tend to think of it as nice and quiet in the mornings. Less craziness to start my day.

I am once again asking people to disambiguate between “stocks go down”, “the economy being bad”, and “a financial crisis occurring”, three distinct things that can happen in any combination

💯 And i am disappointed so many actual institutions like the publisher, Vanity Fair and NY Mag seem to both treat it as only sex and pretend there is no impact on the “journalism” bsky.app/profile/kmth...

Yeah i was often shocked how few wanted to learn about politics at any level. Plus the institutions they work for prefer stories, clicks and don’t take any of this seriously: bsky.app/profile/kmth...

And considering this is the institutional response, it will keep going until it gets worse: bsky.app/profile/kmth...

Agreed. My take won’tchange: Policing is always a dangerous activity and moreso in a nation of guns no matter the stated motivation our guardsmen should be at home and local police should be policing.

Policing is always a dangerous activity and more so in a nation of guns no matter the stated motivation our guardsmen should be at home and local police should be policing.

i assume: When people see that other people think they will have higher than average returns in the future they assume they are right.

Density will make them angry for sure but you could do make them all move London level density and make them more mad by banning private government HOAs.

I loved Shoe Dog but mostly because it cuts off about the time he crosses into a billionaire … but also mostly because J. R. Moehringer is talented.

it’s a troll to get clicks and be relevant

True, but i’d argue even it was shown to improve their profits long-term they’d still demand someone else if it increased their costs (especially labor costs). They don’t just want profit maximization they one a specific type of profit & transaction process that lowers their commitments.

The same but 9/11 and it’s recession and asthma attack. Took right back into politics after leaving after 2000.

People dismiss this because they don’t like Biden.

Let’s be clear @nymag.com is actively claiming the person sleeping with a candidate running, like helping him make deals with the opposition & wrote this had no bias:

“An internal review of her published work has found no … evidence of bias.”

No it’s the best argument. They still have it up.

I know everyone enjoyed this, and he basically has to do it or lots of New Yorkers get hurt, but it makes me very uncomfortable because i am old fart.